Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Network Access Control Software

Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) vs Portnox NAC

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) #4 in Network Access Control Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Arista
Portnox NAC #6 in Network Access Control Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Portnox

Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) leads on 0 checks, Portnox NAC on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreArista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) · 9.0/10
  • Free trialonly Portnox NAC
  • Most featuresPortnox NAC · 4 of 4

Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) scores higher on our rubric for network access control software: 9.0 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

On deployment model, Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) gives you Hybrid where Portnox NAC offers Cloud.

Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) is the better fit for hybrid networks focused on identity and device posture. Portnox NAC is the better fit for cloud-first NAC with continuous risk assessment.

  • Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) fits best

    Hybrid networks focused on identity and device posture

  • Portnox NAC fits best

    Cloud-first NAC with continuous risk assessment

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Portnox NAC 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.6
Ranking #4 in Network Access Control Software #6 in Network Access Control Software
Best for Hybrid networks focused on identity and device posture Cloud-first NAC with continuous risk assessment
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Integrations 14 integrations 5 integrations
Features Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) 3/4 · Portnox NAC 4/4
Wired access control ✓ ✓
Wireless access control ✓ ✓
VPN access control Not checked yet ✓ (best)
802.1X support ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Cloud
Device limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Covers wired, wireless, BYOD, IoT, guest, and certificate-based access
  • Combines profiling, posture assessment, behavioral monitoring, and segmentation
  • Connects with major identity, endpoint, SIEM, and network security tools
  • Controls wired, wireless, and VPN access with cloud RADIUS
  • Combines posture assessment, quarantine, remediation, and segmentation
  • Integrates with Entra ID, Active Directory, Okta, Intune, and Google Workspace
Cons
  • Pricing requires contact with sales
  • Ask AVA cloud troubleshooting is limited to the cloud deployment
  • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of basic access-control teams
  • Pricing requires contact with sales
  • There is no free plan
  • Cloud deployment may not fit on-premises-only requirements
Our verdict

Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) is a network access control platform for enterprise wired and wireless infrastructure. It suits organizations that need identity-based policies across hybrid networks, including BYOD, IoT, guest…

Read the review →

Portnox NAC is a cloud-delivered network access control platform for organizations securing distributed, hybrid, and device-dense networks. It provides visibility across managed, unmanaged, BYOD, IoT, and OT devices, then applies…

Read the review →
  1. Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI)Network Access Control Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. Portnox NACNetwork Access Control Software 8.6Pricing on request · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI) — where it wins

    • Covers wired, wireless, BYOD, IoT, guest, and certificate-based access
    • Combines profiling, posture assessment, behavioral monitoring, and segmentation
    • Connects with major identity, endpoint, SIEM, and network security tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contact with sales
    • Ask AVA cloud troubleshooting is limited to the cloud deployment
    • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of basic access-control teams
  • Portnox NAC — where it wins

    • Controls wired, wireless, and VPN access with cloud RADIUS
    • Combines posture assessment, quarantine, remediation, and segmentation
    • Integrates with Entra ID, Active Directory, Okta, Intune, and Google Workspace

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contact with sales
    • There is no free plan
    • Cloud deployment may not fit on-premises-only requirements
  • Arista Guardian for Network Identity (AGNI)9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad NAC platform for hybrid networks that connect identity, device posture, and segmentation.

    Visit AristaFull verdict →
  • Portnox NAC8.6/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A cloud-first NAC platform combining access control, risk assessment, and zero trust.

    Visit PortnoxFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update