ArchiveBox vs Brozzler

ArchiveBox8.2Visit BBrozzler7.8Visit

Higher score ArchiveBox #5 in Internet Archiving Software 8.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit ArchiveBox

vs

B Brozzler #8 in Internet Archiving Software 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Brozzler

• ArchiveBox fits best

  Teams wanting free, self-hosted web archiving

• Brozzler fits best

  Technical teams archiving JavaScript-heavy websites

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	ArchiveBox 8.2/10 Visit ↗	BBrozzler 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.2	7.8
Ranking	#5 in Internet Archiving Software	#8 in Internet Archiving Software
Best for	Teams wanting free, self-hosted web archiving	Technical teams archiving JavaScript-heavy websites
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Self-hosted	Self-hosted
Platforms	Web, Linux, macOS	Linux
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ArchiveBox 0/2 · Brozzler 0/2
Scheduled crawls	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
API access	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Specs
Capture scope	Not checked yet	Website
Capture frequency	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Archive export	Not checked yet	Warc
Retention period	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Captures pages as HTML, PDFs, screenshots, and WARC files Imports URLs from command-line and batch sources Keeps archived data on user-controlled infrastructure	Uses browser behavior to capture JavaScript-driven pages Distributes crawling across a crawler system Writes captured web archive data in WARC format
Cons	Requires users to manage their own installation and hosting Browsing archives depends on its self-managed web interface Support is through community resources and documentation	Requires teams to deploy and operate it themselves Focused on crawling, not archive browsing or search No hosted archiving service
Our verdict	ArchiveBox saves URLs and web pages into a local archive, making it a fit for individuals, researchers, and organizations that want to preserve online material on infrastructure they control. Its open-source model and self-hosted… Read the review →	Brozzler is an open-source web crawler from the Internet Archive for technical teams that need to capture websites using browser behavior. Its use of a real browser helps it crawl pages that depend on JavaScript, and it writes web archive… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• ArchiveBox — where it wins

  • Captures pages as HTML, PDFs, screenshots, and WARC files
  • Imports URLs from command-line and batch sources
  • Keeps archived data on user-controlled infrastructure

  Where it doesn't

  • Requires users to manage their own installation and hosting
  • Browsing archives depends on its self-managed web interface
  • Support is through community resources and documentation

• Brozzler — where it wins

  • Uses browser behavior to capture JavaScript-driven pages
  • Distributes crawling across a crawler system
  • Writes captured web archive data in WARC format

  Where it doesn't

  • Requires teams to deploy and operate it themselves
  • Focused on crawling, not archive browsing or search
  • No hosted archiving service

• ArchiveBox8.2/10 · Free plan

  A free, self-hosted tool for capturing URLs in several archival formats.

  Visit ArchiveBoxFull verdict →
• BBrozzler7.8/10 · Free plan

  A focused open-source crawler for capturing JavaScript-driven pages as WARC records.

  Visit BrozzlerFull verdict →