Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Forward Proxy Software

Apache Traffic Server vs SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Apache Traffic Server #7 in Forward Proxy Software 7.9/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 3 features Visit site
SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway #8 in Forward Proxy Software 7.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit SafeSquid

Apache Traffic Server leads on 0 checks, SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreApache Traffic Server · 7.9/10
  • Most featuresSafeSquid Secure Web Gateway · 3 of 3

Apache Traffic Server scores higher on our rubric for forward proxy software: 7.9 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.

Apache Traffic Server is the better fit for caching-focused Linux and macOS proxy deployments. SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway is the better fit for hybrid gateways needing strong identity integration.

  • Apache Traffic Server fits best

    Caching-focused Linux and macOS proxy deployments

  • SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway fits best

    Hybrid gateways needing strong identity integration

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Apache Traffic Server 7.9/10 Visit ↗ SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.8
Ranking #7 in Forward Proxy Software #8 in Forward Proxy Software
Best for Caching-focused Linux and macOS proxy deployments Hybrid gateways needing strong identity integration
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Open source Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms macOS, Linux Web, Windows, Linux
Support Email, Community, Docs Tickets, Community, Docs
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Apache Traffic Server 0/3 · SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway 3/3
SSL inspection Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Web filtering Not checked yet ✓ (best)
User authentication Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Deployment Not checked yet Hybrid
Proxy protocols Not checked yet Http/https
Concurrent connections Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, caching, TLS termination, and WebSockets
  • Runs as a forward or reverse proxy with plugin extensibility
  • Provides logging, monitoring, statistics, and configurable traffic controls
  • Broad HTTP/HTTPS filtering, SSL inspection, and application controls
  • Integrates with Active Directory, LDAP, Kerberos, ICAP, and SIEM systems
  • Supports malware scanning, DLP, reporting, clustering, and hybrid deployment
Cons
  • Verified platform coverage is limited to Linux and macOS
  • Self-hosted installation and configuration require administrator involvement
  • Rate limiting is provided through a plugin rather than a single built-in policy feature
  • Pricing is handled through sales rather than a public rate card
  • Its broad policy scope may require more administration than a narrow proxy
  • Its forwarding focus is centered on HTTP and HTTPS traffic
Our verdict

Apache Traffic Server is open-source, self-hosted proxy software for organizations handling HTTP traffic through forward or reverse proxy deployments. It is positioned for enterprises, internet service providers, backbone providers, large…

Read the review →

SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway is a software-based HTTP(S) forward proxy for enterprise web security. It inspects and controls Layer 7 traffic, with URL, domain, text, image, and custom-category filtering alongside HTTPS inspection, malware…

Read the review →
  1. Apache Traffic ServerForward Proxy Software 7.9Open source
  2. SafeSquid Secure Web GatewayForward Proxy Software 7.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Apache Traffic Server — where it wins

    • Supports HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, caching, TLS termination, and WebSockets
    • Runs as a forward or reverse proxy with plugin extensibility
    • Provides logging, monitoring, statistics, and configurable traffic controls

    Where it doesn't

    • Verified platform coverage is limited to Linux and macOS
    • Self-hosted installation and configuration require administrator involvement
    • Rate limiting is provided through a plugin rather than a single built-in policy feature
  • SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway — where it wins

    • Broad HTTP/HTTPS filtering, SSL inspection, and application controls
    • Integrates with Active Directory, LDAP, Kerberos, ICAP, and SIEM systems
    • Supports malware scanning, DLP, reporting, clustering, and hybrid deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through sales rather than a public rate card
    • Its broad policy scope may require more administration than a narrow proxy
    • Its forwarding focus is centered on HTTP and HTTPS traffic
  • Apache Traffic Server7.9/10 · Open source

    A self-hosted proxy for caching-focused Linux and macOS deployments.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • SafeSquid Secure Web Gateway7.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A hybrid forward proxy with deep filtering, identity controls, inspection, and reporting.

    Visit SafeSquidFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update