Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Version Control Software

Apache Subversion vs Fossil

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Apache Subversion #4 in Version Control Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Subversion
Fossil #13 in Version Control Software 7.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Fossil

Apache Subversion leads on 3 checks, Fossil on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreApache Subversion · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresApache Subversion · 4 of 4

Apache Subversion scores higher on our rubric for version control software: 8.8 against 7.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #13.

On versioning model, Apache Subversion gives you Centralized where Fossil offers Distributed. On large-file handling, Apache Subversion gives you Native where Fossil offers None. Apache Subversion offers file locking; Fossil doesn't. Apache Subversion offers sparse checkout; Fossil doesn't. Apache Subversion offers nested repositories; Fossil doesn't.

Apache Subversion is the better fit for free centralized version control. Fossil is the better fit for all-in-one self-hosted project repositories.

  • Apache Subversion fits best

    Free centralized version control

  • Fossil fits best

    All-in-one self-hosted project repositories

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Apache Subversion 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Fossil 7.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 7.7
Ranking #4 in Version Control Software #13 in Version Control Software
Best for Free centralized version control All-in-one self-hosted project repositories
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Apache Subversion 4/4 · Fossil 1/4
Self-hosted deployment ✓ ✓
File locking ✓ (best) —
Sparse checkout ✓ (best) —
Nested repositories ✓ (best) —
Specs
Versioning model Centralized Distributed
Desktop platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Linux, macOS, Windows
Large-file handling Native None
Our review
Pros
  • Atomic commits, merge tracking, branching, and tagging
  • Native binary handling, file locking, and sparse checkouts
  • Self-hosted and cross-platform across Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • Distributed version control with branching, merging, and repository synchronization
  • Built-in bug tracking, wiki, forum, chat, and email alerts
  • Self-hosted repositories with HTTPS, SSH, and SQLite-backed storage
Cons
  • Centralized workflows are less suited to teams seeking distributed version control
  • Self-hosted deployment requires managing svnserve or Apache HTTP Server
  • Third-party packages require separate consideration across desktop platforms
  • No built-in file locking
  • No sparse checkout
  • GitHub integration is limited to mirroring
Our verdict

Apache Subversion is a free, open-source, centralized version control system for individuals, development teams, and enterprise projects. It manages versioned files and directories through client/server repository access, with support for…

Read the review →

Fossil is a free, open-source distributed version control system for software projects that need self-hosted repositories and more than source management alone. It combines versioning, branching, merging, and repository synchronization…

Read the review →
  1. Apache SubversionVersion Control Software 8.8Free plan
  2. FossilVersion Control Software 7.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Apache Subversion — where it wins

    • Atomic commits, merge tracking, branching, and tagging
    • Native binary handling, file locking, and sparse checkouts
    • Self-hosted and cross-platform across Windows, macOS, and Linux

    Where it doesn't

    • Centralized workflows are less suited to teams seeking distributed version control
    • Self-hosted deployment requires managing svnserve or Apache HTTP Server
    • Third-party packages require separate consideration across desktop platforms

  • Fossil — where it wins

    • Distributed version control with branching, merging, and repository synchronization
    • Built-in bug tracking, wiki, forum, chat, and email alerts
    • Self-hosted repositories with HTTPS, SSH, and SQLite-backed storage

    Where it doesn't

    • No built-in file locking
    • No sparse checkout
    • GitHub integration is limited to mirroring

More comparisons

All version control software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update