Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · ML Experiment Tracking Software

Amazon SageMaker Experiments vs Hopsworks AI Lakehouse

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Hopsworks AI Lakehouse #7 in ML Experiment Tracking Software 8.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Hopsworks

Amazon SageMaker Experiments leads on 0 checks, Hopsworks AI Lakehouse on 1, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAmazon SageMaker Experiments · 8.6/10
  • Free planonly Hopsworks AI Lakehouse
  • Most featuresHopsworks AI Lakehouse · 5 of 5

Amazon SageMaker Experiments scores higher on our rubric for ml experiment tracking software: 8.6 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

Hopsworks AI Lakehouse offers free plan; Amazon SageMaker Experiments doesn't.

Amazon SageMaker Experiments is the better fit for AWS-native ML teams. Hopsworks AI Lakehouse is the better fit for teams needing tracking plus feature governance.

  • Amazon SageMaker Experiments fits best

    AWS-native ML teams

  • Hopsworks AI Lakehouse fits best

    Teams needing tracking plus feature governance

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Amazon SageMaker Experiments 8.6/10 Visit ↗ Hopsworks AI Lakehouse 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.6 8.2
Ranking #4 in ML Experiment Tracking Software #7 in ML Experiment Tracking Software
Best for AWS-native ML teams Teams needing tracking plus feature governance
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — —
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, 2FA
Integrations 5 integrations 32+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Amazon SageMaker Experiments 4/5 · Hopsworks AI Lakehouse 5/5
Run comparison ✓ ✓
Artifact tracking ✓ ✓
Dataset versioning Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Model registry ✓ ✓
API and SDK access ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment options Cloud Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Tracks parameters, metrics, configurations, results, and artifacts
  • Compares experiment runs with metrics and charts
  • Connects MLflow, S3, registries, pipelines, APIs, and SDKs
  • Free plan includes experiment tracking, comparisons, artifacts, and one project
  • Covers datasets, features, models, serving, lineage, and monitoring
  • Supports web, API, self-hosted, cloud, on-premise, and air-gapped deployments
Cons
  • No free plan
  • Compute and storage are billed separately
  • Best suited to teams already centered on AWS services
  • The Free plan is limited to 1 project
  • SaaS costs vary with usage, complicating fixed-budget planning
  • Broader than a focused experiment-tracking product
Our verdict

Amazon SageMaker Experiments helps data scientists and developers organize, track, analyze, and compare machine learning experiments and training runs. It supports inputs, parameters, configurations, metrics, results, and output artifacts,…

Read the review →

Hopsworks AI Lakehouse brings experiment tracking into a wider platform for building and operating machine-learning and AI systems. It is suited to teams that need to record training runs, metrics, logs, hyperparameters, outputs, and…

Read the review →
  1. Amazon SageMaker ExperimentsML Experiment Tracking Software 8.6Paid
  2. Hopsworks AI LakehouseML Experiment Tracking Software 8.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Amazon SageMaker Experiments — where it wins

    • Tracks parameters, metrics, configurations, results, and artifacts
    • Compares experiment runs with metrics and charts
    • Connects MLflow, S3, registries, pipelines, APIs, and SDKs

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan
    • Compute and storage are billed separately
    • Best suited to teams already centered on AWS services
  • Hopsworks AI Lakehouse — where it wins

    • Free plan includes experiment tracking, comparisons, artifacts, and one project
    • Covers datasets, features, models, serving, lineage, and monitoring
    • Supports web, API, self-hosted, cloud, on-premise, and air-gapped deployments

    Where it doesn't

    • The Free plan is limited to 1 project
    • SaaS costs vary with usage, complicating fixed-budget planning
    • Broader than a focused experiment-tracking product
  • Amazon SageMaker Experiments8.6/10 · Paid

    A strong fit for AWS-native teams that need tracking, comparison, artifacts, and MLflow.

    Visit AWSFull verdict →
  • Hopsworks AI Lakehouse8.2/10 · Free plan

    A broad AI lakehouse for teams that need tracking alongside feature and model governance.

    Visit HopsworksFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update