Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Data Preparation for Analytics

Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler vs Apache Hop

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Apache Hop #6 in Data Preparation for Analytics 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Apache Hop

Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler leads on 0 checks, Apache Hop on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAmazon SageMaker Data Wrangler · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly Apache Hop
  • Most featuresAmazon SageMaker Data Wrangler · 1 of 3

Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler scores higher on our rubric for data preparation for analytics: 9.0 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

Apache Hop offers free plan; Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler doesn't. On deployment, Apache Hop gives you Hybrid where Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler offers Cloud.

Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler is the better fit for AWS analytics teams building SageMaker workflows. Apache Hop is the better fit for teams wanting free, flexible visual pipelines.

  • Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler fits best

    AWS analytics teams building SageMaker workflows

  • Apache Hop fits best

    Teams wanting free, flexible visual pipelines

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Apache Hop 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.7
Ranking #3 in Data Preparation for Analytics #6 in Data Preparation for Analytics
Best for AWS analytics teams building SageMaker workflows Teams wanting free, flexible visual pipelines
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price — Free plan
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 10 integrations 20 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler 1/3 · Apache Hop 0/3
Data quality checks Not checked yet Not checked yet
Scheduled runs ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Version control Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Cloud Hybrid
Workflow interface Not checked yet Not checked yet
Source connectors Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Visual flows pair 300+ transformations with data-quality and insights reports.
  • Custom transformations support Python, PySpark, SQL, and Pandas.
  • Exports connect flows to SageMaker Pipelines, Feature Store, notebooks, and scripts.
  • Visual pipeline and workflow design with metadata-driven configuration
  • 250+ transforms, 80+ workflow actions, and 40+ database dialects
  • Runs locally or on server, Spark, Flink, and Dataflow
Cons
  • Usage-based compute, storage, and processing costs can be harder to predict.
  • Its SageMaker focus is a narrower fit for teams outside the AWS ecosystem.
  • The published support channel is documentation.
  • ETL and orchestration focus is less tailored to interactive data preparation
  • Broad runtime choices can add complexity to selecting a deployment approach
  • Support is through community channels and documentation
Our verdict

Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler helps machine learning teams prepare tabular, time-series, text, and image data in the cloud. Its visual flows support combining datasets, profiling and cleaning data, applying transformations, and analyzing…

Read the review →

Apache Hop is an open-source platform for designing data pipelines and workflows, aimed at data engineers and teams building repeatable integration and orchestration processes. Its visual development environment and metadata-driven…

Read the review →
  1. Amazon SageMaker Data WranglerData Preparation for Analytics 9.0Paid
  2. Apache HopData Preparation for Analytics 8.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler — where it wins

    • Visual flows pair 300+ transformations with data-quality and insights reports.
    • Custom transformations support Python, PySpark, SQL, and Pandas.
    • Exports connect flows to SageMaker Pipelines, Feature Store, notebooks, and scripts.

    Where it doesn't

    • Usage-based compute, storage, and processing costs can be harder to predict.
    • Its SageMaker focus is a narrower fit for teams outside the AWS ecosystem.
    • The published support channel is documentation.
  • Apache Hop — where it wins

    • Visual pipeline and workflow design with metadata-driven configuration
    • 250+ transforms, 80+ workflow actions, and 40+ database dialects
    • Runs locally or on server, Spark, Flink, and Dataflow

    Where it doesn't

    • ETL and orchestration focus is less tailored to interactive data preparation
    • Broad runtime choices can add complexity to selecting a deployment approach
    • Support is through community channels and documentation
  • Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler9.0/10 · Paid

    A visual preparation workflow with extensive transformations and direct SageMaker exports.

    Visit AWSFull verdict →
  • Apache Hop8.7/10 · Free plan

    A flexible, free pipeline platform for teams building data integration workflows.

    Visit Apache HopFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update