Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Managed Database Hosting

Amazon RDS vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side

Amazon RDS leads on 0 checks, Azure Database for PostgreSQL on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAmazon RDS · 9.4/10

Amazon RDS scores higher on our rubric for managed database hosting: 9.4 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.

Amazon RDS is the better fit for AWS teams needing broad managed SQL coverage. Azure Database for PostgreSQL is the better fit for azure teams needing managed PostgreSQL.

  • Amazon RDS fits best

    AWS teams needing broad managed SQL coverage

  • Azure Database for PostgreSQL fits best

    Azure teams needing managed PostgreSQL

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Amazon RDS 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Azure Database for PostgreSQL 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.7
Ranking #1 in Managed Database Hosting #8 in Managed Database Hosting
Best for AWS teams needing broad managed SQL coverage Azure teams needing managed PostgreSQL
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not checked yet —
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Phone, Live chat, Email, Community, Docs · 24/7 Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Amazon RDS 2/3 · Azure Database for PostgreSQL 2/3
High availability ✓ ✓
Point-in-time recovery Not checked yet Not checked yet
Read replicas ✓ ✓
Specs
Database type Not checked yet Not checked yet
Scaling model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Backup retention Not checked yet 7 days
Our review
Pros
  • Supports eight database engines in the AWS environment
  • Automates provisioning, patching, backups, and point-in-time recovery
  • Combines Multi-AZ failover, read replicas, monitoring, and AWS integrations
  • Automatic backups, point-in-time restore, and configurable retention
  • High availability with standby failover and zone-redundant options
  • Private networking, PgBouncer, replicas, and Entra authentication
Cons
  • No free plan
  • Usage-based pricing varies by region, engine, instance, and configuration
  • The feature set is closely tied to the AWS environment
  • No perpetual free plan
  • Cloud deployment is centered on the Azure ecosystem
  • Pricing depends on region, currency, agreement, and usage
Our verdict

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a managed relational database service for deploying, operating, and scaling databases in AWS. It is suited to teams that want AWS to handle infrastructure provisioning, patching, backups,…

Read the review →

Azure Database for PostgreSQL is a fully managed cloud database service built on the PostgreSQL engine. It is aimed at teams running applications and APIs on Azure that want Microsoft to handle infrastructure provisioning, patching,…

Read the review →
  1. Amazon RDSManaged Database Hosting 9.4Paid
  2. Azure Database for PostgreSQLManaged Database Hosting 8.7Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Amazon RDS — where it wins

    • Supports eight database engines in the AWS environment
    • Automates provisioning, patching, backups, and point-in-time recovery
    • Combines Multi-AZ failover, read replicas, monitoring, and AWS integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan
    • Usage-based pricing varies by region, engine, instance, and configuration
    • The feature set is closely tied to the AWS environment
  • Azure Database for PostgreSQL — where it wins

    • Automatic backups, point-in-time restore, and configurable retention
    • High availability with standby failover and zone-redundant options
    • Private networking, PgBouncer, replicas, and Entra authentication

    Where it doesn't

    • No perpetual free plan
    • Cloud deployment is centered on the Azure ecosystem
    • Pricing depends on region, currency, agreement, and usage

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update