Amazon EC2 vs Vultr Bare Metal

Amazon EC28.8Visit Vultr Bare Metal8.5Visit

Higher score Amazon EC2 #5 in Cloud Dedicated Server Hosting 8.8/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Amazon EC2

vs

Vultr Bare Metal #8 in Cloud Dedicated Server Hosting 8.5/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 3 features Try Vultr Bare Metal

• Amazon EC2 fits best

  AWS-centric teams needing scalable compute

• Vultr Bare Metal fits best

  Developers wanting flexible bare-metal automation

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Amazon EC2 8.8/10 Visit ↗	Vultr Bare Metal 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.8	8.5
Ranking	#5 in Cloud Dedicated Server Hosting	#8 in Cloud Dedicated Server Hosting
Best for	AWS-centric teams needing scalable compute	Developers wanting flexible bare-metal automation
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	—	$120/device/mo
Free plan	—	Not checked yet
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms	Web	Web
Features Amazon EC2 0/3 · Vultr Bare Metal 0/3
NVMe storage	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
GPU instances	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Hourly billing	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Specs
CPU architecture	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Entry-plan RAM	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Network uplink	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Autoscaling can adjust capacity and replace unhealthy instances automatically Integrates with S3, RDS, CloudWatch, and Elastic Load Balancing Supports multiple instance types, Regions, and purchasing options	Single-tenant physical servers without a virtualization layer Provisioning via console, API, CLI, or Terraform VPC, firewall groups, RAID, iPXE, and startup-script support
Cons	Core instances are virtual rather than dedicated bare metal Pricing varies by instance type, Region, operating system, and usage Requires choosing among complex compute and purchasing options	Unmanaged service requires operational responsibility Backups are not included Hardware availability and pricing may vary by region
Our verdict	Amazon EC2 provides resizable virtual servers for running applications in the AWS cloud. It is aimed at developers, IT teams, and organizations that need configurable compute for workloads ranging from development to production. Users can… Read the review →	Vultr Bare Metal provides single-tenant physical servers for developers, businesses, and enterprises running demanding workloads. Each server offers dedicated hardware without a virtualization layer, with SSD storage and IPv4 and IPv6… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Amazon EC2 — where it wins

  • Autoscaling can adjust capacity and replace unhealthy instances automatically
  • Integrates with S3, RDS, CloudWatch, and Elastic Load Balancing
  • Supports multiple instance types, Regions, and purchasing options

  Where it doesn't

  • Core instances are virtual rather than dedicated bare metal
  • Pricing varies by instance type, Region, operating system, and usage
  • Requires choosing among complex compute and purchasing options

• Vultr Bare Metal — where it wins

  • Single-tenant physical servers without a virtualization layer
  • Provisioning via console, API, CLI, or Terraform
  • VPC, firewall groups, RAID, iPXE, and startup-script support

  Where it doesn't

  • Unmanaged service requires operational responsibility
  • Backups are not included
  • Hardware availability and pricing may vary by region

• Amazon EC28.8/10 · Paid

  Flexible AWS compute with autoscaling and broad service integrations.

  Visit Amazon EC2Full verdict →
• Vultr Bare Metal8.5/10 · Paid

  A flexible bare-metal option for developers automating dedicated infrastructure.

  Try Vultr Bare MetalFull verdict →