Head-to-head · Test Analytics Software
Allure TestOps vs Tesults
Allure TestOps leads on 0 checks, Tesults on 2, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreAllure TestOps · 9.1/10
- Lowest starting priceTesults · $19/user/mo
- Free planonly Tesults
- Free trialonly Allure TestOps
- Most featuresAllure TestOps · 4 of 4
Allure TestOps scores higher on our rubric for test analytics software: 9.1 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #9.
Tesults offers free plan; Allure TestOps doesn't. Tesults is cheaper to start at $19/mo against $39/mo.
Allure TestOps is the better fit for mature teams needing test management plus analytics. Tesults is the better fit for teams wanting low-cost multi-framework reporting.
- Allure TestOps fits best
Mature teams needing test management plus analytics
- Tesults fits best
Teams wanting low-cost multi-framework reporting
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Allure TestOps 9.1/10 Visit ↗ | Tesults 8.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Ranking | #4 in Test Analytics Software | #9 in Test Analytics Software |
| Best for | Mature teams needing test management plus analytics | Teams wanting low-cost multi-framework reporting |
| Pricing model | Paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | $39/user/mo | $19/user/mo (best) |
| Free plan | — | ✓ (best) |
| Free trial | 14 days | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud, Mobile |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Support | Tickets, Community, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SSO/SAML | GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA |
| Integrations | 37+ integrations | 6 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Allure TestOps 4/4 · Tesults 3/4 | ||
| Flaky-test detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Failure analysis | ✓ | ✓ |
| Execution trend reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-hosted deployment | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Supported frameworks | Playwright, Playwright Java, WebdriverIO, TestCafe, Cypress, CodeceptJS, Jest, Vitest, Mocha, Jasmine, Ava, Node.js Test Runner, Bun, Cucumber.js, Newman, JUnit 5, JUnit 4, TestNG, Spock, Cucumber-JVM, JBehave, pytest, Pytest-BDD, Behave, Robot Framework, NUnit, xUnit.net, Reqnroll, Go, Dart and Flutter, PHPUnit, Codeception, Behat, RSpec, Cucumber.rb, Rust Cargo Test | EXP, GoogleTest, Rust #[test], nextest, rstest, JUnit 5, JUnit 4, TestNG, pytest, Robot Framework, NUnit 3, xUnit, MSTest, RSpec, Mocha, Jasmine, Jest, Playwright, WebdriverIO, CodeceptJS, Nightwatch, Vitest, Waffle, Postman, Protractor, Cypress, TestCafe, XCTest, Espresso, Selenium, ROS 2, colcon |
| CI/CD integrations | Jenkins, GitLab CI, GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps CI, Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, TeamCity, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, Tekton | GitHub Actions |
| Data retention | Not checked yet | 90 days |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Allure TestOps is a web-based test management and analytics platform for QA and development teams. It brings manual test cases, automated results, launches, dashboards, defects, and execution history into one system. Teams can connect… Read the review → |
Tesults is a cloud-based test reporting and analytics platform for engineering and QA teams. It collects automated and manual test results, stores historical runs, and presents dashboards for test trends, run comparisons, regression… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Allure TestOps — where it wins
- Combines manual cases, automation results, dashboards, and execution history
- Supports flaky-test detection, failure analysis, trends, selective runs, and reruns
- Connects with major CI/CD, issue-tracking, and test-management tools
Where it doesn't
- Starts at $39 per user per month on the Cloud plan
- No free plan is available
- Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of smaller teams
Tesults — where it wins
- Lifetime free plan with unlimited users and third-party integrations
- Flaky-test detection, regression analysis, and failure explanations
- Supports a broad range of testing frameworks and result formats
Where it doesn't
- CI integration is limited to GitHub Actions
- Free plan limits automated history to 30 days
- Paid plans use active-user pricing and separate storage limits
- Allure TestOps9.1/10 · 14-day trial
A broad test analytics suite for mature QA teams, priced above free alternatives.
Visit Allure TestOpsFull verdict → - Tesults8.6/10 · Free plan
Low-cost test analytics with broad framework coverage and focused CI connectivity.
Visit TesultsFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Allure Report vs Allure TestOps
- BrowserStack Test Reporting & Analytics vs Allure TestOps
- ReportPortal vs Allure TestOps
- Allure TestOps vs Testspace
- Allure TestOps vs Trunk Flaky Tests
- Allure TestOps vs Qualflare
- Allure TestOps vs Flakiness.io
All test analytics software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update








