Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · CAE Software

Adams vs Code_Aster

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Adams #5 in CAE Software 8.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Contact Hexagon
Code_Aster #8 in CAE Software 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit Code_Aster

Adams leads on 0 checks, Code_Aster on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAdams · 8.3/10
  • Free planonly Code_Aster
  • Most featuresCode_Aster · 2 of 4

Adams scores higher on our rubric for cae software: 8.3 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

Adams is the better fit for mechanical teams simulating moving systems. Code_Aster is the better fit for structural teams wanting free, deep analysis.

  • Adams fits best

    Mechanical teams simulating moving systems

  • Code_Aster fits best

    Structural teams wanting free, deep analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Adams 8.3/10 Visit ↗ Code_Aster 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.3 7.8
Ranking #5 in CAE Software #8 in CAE Software
Best for Mechanical teams simulating moving systems Structural teams wanting free, deep analysis
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request Free plan
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, Linux Linux, Windows
Support Community, Docs Docs, Community
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Adams 0/4 · Code_Aster 2/4
Built-in meshing Not checked yet —
HPC support Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Design optimization Not checked yet ✓ (best)
CAD import Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Analysis types Not checked yet Structural mechanics; thermomechanics; thermal; geomechanics; modal, spectral and dynamic; acoustics; fluid-structure and soil-structure interaction; fatigue; fracture; seismic; sensitivity and optimization
Deployment Not checked yet Both
Our review
Pros
  • Simulates multibody dynamics and supports system-level design validation
  • Adams Car adds specialized vehicle-dynamics simulation
  • Adams Real Time integrates models with hardware and control software
  • Broad structural, thermal, geomechanical, seismic, fatigue, and fracture analysis
  • HPC, sensitivity calculations, optimization, and Python-based study automation
  • Integrates with MUMPS, PETSc, MFront, and Salome-Meca
Cons
  • Desktop deployment limits it to Windows and Linux environments
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Its focus is narrower than general-purpose CAE suites
  • Meshing is provided through the separate Salome-Meca environment
  • Support is centered on documentation and community channels
  • No built-in AI features are provided
Our verdict

Adams is multibody dynamics software for engineers evaluating how moving mechanical parts and systems behave. It is aimed at mechanical teams that need to validate system-level designs, particularly in vehicle and other moving-system work.…

Read the review →

Code_Aster is EDF R&D’s open-source finite element solver for numerical simulation of structures and materials. It is aimed at researchers and engineers working across energy, nuclear, civil engineering, transport, and aerospace, with…

Read the review →
  1. AdamsCAE Software 8.3Pricing on request
  2. Code_AsterCAE Software 7.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Adams — where it wins

    • Simulates multibody dynamics and supports system-level design validation
    • Adams Car adds specialized vehicle-dynamics simulation
    • Adams Real Time integrates models with hardware and control software

    Where it doesn't

    • Desktop deployment limits it to Windows and Linux environments
    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Its focus is narrower than general-purpose CAE suites
  • Code_Aster — where it wins

    • Broad structural, thermal, geomechanical, seismic, fatigue, and fracture analysis
    • HPC, sensitivity calculations, optimization, and Python-based study automation
    • Integrates with MUMPS, PETSc, MFront, and Salome-Meca

    Where it doesn't

    • Meshing is provided through the separate Salome-Meca environment
    • Support is centered on documentation and community channels
    • No built-in AI features are provided

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update