Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · CAE Software

Autodesk Moldflow vs Code_Aster

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Autodesk Moldflow #4 in CAE Software 8.5/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Moldflow
Code_Aster #8 in CAE Software 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit Code_Aster

Autodesk Moldflow leads on 1 check, Code_Aster on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAutodesk Moldflow · 8.5/10
  • Free planonly Code_Aster
  • Free trialonly Autodesk Moldflow
  • Most featuresAutodesk Moldflow · 4 of 4

Autodesk Moldflow scores higher on our rubric for cae software: 8.5 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

Code_Aster offers free plan; Autodesk Moldflow doesn't. Autodesk Moldflow offers built-in meshing; Code_Aster doesn't.

Autodesk Moldflow is the better fit for plastic-parts teams analyzing molding processes. Code_Aster is the better fit for structural teams wanting free, deep analysis.

  • Autodesk Moldflow fits best

    Plastic-parts teams analyzing molding processes

  • Code_Aster fits best

    Structural teams wanting free, deep analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Autodesk Moldflow 8.5/10 Visit ↗ Code_Aster 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 7.8
Ranking #4 in CAE Software #8 in CAE Software
Best for Plastic-parts teams analyzing molding processes Structural teams wanting free, deep analysis
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free plan
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Desktop, Cloud Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, Linux Linux, Windows
Support Docs · 24/7 Docs, Community
Integrations 3 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Autodesk Moldflow 4/4 · Code_Aster 2/4
Built-in meshing ✓ (best) —
HPC support ✓ ✓
Design optimization ✓ ✓
CAD import ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Analysis types Injection molding; compression molding; material flow; mold cooling; warpage; fiber orientation; birefringence; crystallinity Structural mechanics; thermomechanics; thermal; geomechanics; modal, spectral and dynamic; acoustics; fluid-structure and soil-structure interaction; fatigue; fracture; seismic; sensitivity and optimization
Deployment Both Both
Our review
Pros
  • Simulates injection and compression molding, including filling, packing, and cooling
  • Automated meshing and native CAD import support simulation workflows
  • Insight offers local, remote, and cloud solving plus optimization tools
  • Broad structural, thermal, geomechanical, seismic, fatigue, and fracture analysis
  • HPC, sensitivity calculations, optimization, and Python-based study automation
  • Integrates with MUMPS, PETSc, MFront, and Salome-Meca
Cons
  • Its focus is molding rather than broad, general-purpose CAE
  • Subscriptions require contacting Autodesk sales
  • There is no free plan; access is through a 30-day trial or paid subscription
  • Meshing is provided through the separate Salome-Meca environment
  • Support is centered on documentation and community channels
  • No built-in AI features are provided
Our verdict

Autodesk Moldflow simulates plastic injection and compression molding for engineers, analysts, and mold designers assessing manufacturability and molded-part quality. Its analysis covers material flow, mold cooling, warpage, and process…

Read the review →

Code_Aster is EDF R&D’s open-source finite element solver for numerical simulation of structures and materials. It is aimed at researchers and engineers working across energy, nuclear, civil engineering, transport, and aerospace, with…

Read the review →
  1. Autodesk MoldflowCAE Software 8.5Pricing on request · 30-day trial
  2. Code_AsterCAE Software 7.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Autodesk Moldflow — where it wins

    • Simulates injection and compression molding, including filling, packing, and cooling
    • Automated meshing and native CAD import support simulation workflows
    • Insight offers local, remote, and cloud solving plus optimization tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Its focus is molding rather than broad, general-purpose CAE
    • Subscriptions require contacting Autodesk sales
    • There is no free plan; access is through a 30-day trial or paid subscription
  • Code_Aster — where it wins

    • Broad structural, thermal, geomechanical, seismic, fatigue, and fracture analysis
    • HPC, sensitivity calculations, optimization, and Python-based study automation
    • Integrates with MUMPS, PETSc, MFront, and Salome-Meca

    Where it doesn't

    • Meshing is provided through the separate Salome-Meca environment
    • Support is centered on documentation and community channels
    • No built-in AI features are provided
  • Autodesk Moldflow8.5/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A focused simulation suite for assessing plastic molding processes and part quality.

    Visit MoldflowFull verdict →
  • Code_Aster7.8/10 · Free plan

    A free, open-source solver with broad multiphysics and structural analysis depth.

    Visit Code_AsterFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update