Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Wearables Tracking

ActiGraph CentrePoint vs Oura Teams

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score ActiGraph CentrePoint #2 in Wearables Tracking 9.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 2 features Contact sales
Oura Teams #5 in Wearables Tracking 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Oura Teams

ActiGraph CentrePoint leads on 0 checks, Oura Teams on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreActiGraph CentrePoint · 9.1/10
  • Most featuresActiGraph CentrePoint · 2 of 2

ActiGraph CentrePoint scores higher on our rubric for wearables tracking: 9.1 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.

ActiGraph CentrePoint is the better fit for teams running managed ActiGraph wearable studies. Oura Teams is the better fit for organizations monitoring Oura Ring member groups.

  • ActiGraph CentrePoint fits best

    Teams running managed ActiGraph wearable studies

  • Oura Teams fits best

    Organizations monitoring Oura Ring member groups

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ActiGraph CentrePoint 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Oura Teams 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.7
Ranking #2 in Wearables Tracking #5 in Wearables Tracking
Best for Teams running managed ActiGraph wearable studies Organizations monitoring Oura Ring member groups
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Docs Email
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ActiGraph CentrePoint 2/2 · Oura Teams 1/2
Real-time tracking ✓ (best) Not checked yet
API access ✓ ✓
Specs
Data tracked Movement and raw acceleration; physical activity, activity adherence, sleep, and near-body temperature (Insight Watch sensor available upon request) Sleep, activity, readiness, heart rate, resting heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), VO2 Max, blood pressure signals, nighttime breathing, temperature trends, sleep stages, SpO2, stress, resilience, steps, calories burned, distance
Supported wearables CentrePoint Insight Watch; ActiGraph LEAP Oura Ring
Data retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Monitors participant adherence and wear periods near real time
  • Automates device assignment and study setup workflows
  • Supports raw-data reprocessing and API transfer to other systems
  • Configurable group dashboards with selectable metrics and metric sets
  • CSV or JSON exports plus an Enterprise API for external systems
  • Tracks a broad range of Oura-derived health measures
Cons
  • Compatible wearables are limited to CentrePoint Insight Watch and ActiGraph LEAP
  • Order-specific pricing requires a quote from sales
  • Study teams need compatible ActiGraph devices to collect wearable data
  • Supports Oura Ring only
  • Requires a purchased subscription; fees are set in an order
  • Group metrics cover date ranges up to 45 days
Our verdict

For clinical trial and health research teams, CentrePoint collects, processes, manages, and stores wearable-derived study data in the cloud. Compatible ActiGraph wearables send data through the CentrePoint Connect mobile app or Data Hub,…

Read the review →

Oura Teams gives organizations a web dashboard for organizing Oura Ring members and reviewing their health data in groups. Administrators and coaches can invite members, create private groups, and manage coach and administrator roles. It…

Read the review →
  1. ActiGraph CentrePointWearables Tracking 9.1Pricing on request
  2. Oura TeamsWearables Tracking 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ActiGraph CentrePoint — where it wins

    • Monitors participant adherence and wear periods near real time
    • Automates device assignment and study setup workflows
    • Supports raw-data reprocessing and API transfer to other systems

    Where it doesn't

    • Compatible wearables are limited to CentrePoint Insight Watch and ActiGraph LEAP
    • Order-specific pricing requires a quote from sales
    • Study teams need compatible ActiGraph devices to collect wearable data

  • Oura Teams — where it wins

    • Configurable group dashboards with selectable metrics and metric sets
    • CSV or JSON exports plus an Enterprise API for external systems
    • Tracks a broad range of Oura-derived health measures

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports Oura Ring only
    • Requires a purchased subscription; fees are set in an order
    • Group metrics cover date ranges up to 45 days
  • ActiGraph CentrePoint9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    A study operations portal for teams monitoring wearable data from ActiGraph devices.

    Contact salesFull verdict →
  • Oura Teams8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused group analytics dashboard for organizations using Oura Rings.

    Visit Oura TeamsFull verdict →

More comparisons

All wearables tracking comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update