Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Kubernetes Security Software

AccuKnox vs SUSE NeuVector

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score AccuKnox #5 in Kubernetes Security Software 8.8/10 Free plan · pricing on request · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 5 features Visit AccuKnox
SUSE NeuVector #6 in Kubernetes Security Software 8.7/10 Open source ✓ 3 of 5 features Visit SUSE NeuVector

AccuKnox leads on 0 checks, SUSE NeuVector on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAccuKnox · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly AccuKnox
  • Free trialonly AccuKnox
  • Most featuresSUSE NeuVector · 3 of 5

AccuKnox scores higher on our rubric for kubernetes security software: 8.8 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #6.

On deployment model, AccuKnox gives you Hybrid where SUSE NeuVector offers Self_hosted.

AccuKnox is the better fit for teams wanting broad security with a free plan. SUSE NeuVector is the better fit for open-source teams needing broad container security.

  • AccuKnox fits best

    Teams wanting broad security with a free plan

  • SUSE NeuVector fits best

    Open-source teams needing broad container security

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature AccuKnox 8.8/10 Visit ↗ SUSE NeuVector 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.7
Ranking #5 in Kubernetes Security Software #6 in Kubernetes Security Software
Best for Teams wanting broad security with a free plan Open-source teams needing broad container security
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price Free plan · pricing on request · 30-day trial Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Phone, Tickets, Docs · 24/7 Tickets, Community, Docs · 24/7
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SSO/SAML
Integrations 50+ integrations 16 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features AccuKnox 0/5 · SUSE NeuVector 3/5
Image scanning Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Posture management Not checked yet Not checked yet
Runtime protection Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Admission control Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Identity security Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Self_hosted
Managed Kubernetes Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Protects Kubernetes, containers, VMs, bare metal, and serverless workloads
  • Combines runtime detection, response, microsegmentation, and compliance
  • Integrates with major clouds, SIEMs, DevOps, ticketing, and alerting tools
  • Free open-source image and registry scanning
  • Runtime protection, segmentation, and admission control
  • Multi-cluster management with CI/CD integrations
Cons
  • Paid pricing uses a custom-quote model
  • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of Kubernetes-only teams
  • The free plan is limited to the basic platform and up to 10 worker nodes
  • Self-hosted deployment limits platform coverage
  • Requires teams to operate the security platform
  • Policy breadth may exceed narrow security needs
Our verdict

AccuKnox is a cloud-native application protection platform for security, DevOps, and platform teams managing workloads across public, private, hybrid, and air-gapped environments. Coverage includes Kubernetes, containers, virtual machines,…

Read the review →

SUSE NeuVector is an open-source, Kubernetes-native container security platform for teams building and operating containerized applications. It covers vulnerability and compliance scanning across images, registries, containers, hosts, and…

Read the review →
  1. AccuKnoxKubernetes Security Software 8.8Free plan · pricing on request · 30-day trial
  2. SUSE NeuVectorKubernetes Security Software 8.7Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • AccuKnox — where it wins

    • Protects Kubernetes, containers, VMs, bare metal, and serverless workloads
    • Combines runtime detection, response, microsegmentation, and compliance
    • Integrates with major clouds, SIEMs, DevOps, ticketing, and alerting tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid pricing uses a custom-quote model
    • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of Kubernetes-only teams
    • The free plan is limited to the basic platform and up to 10 worker nodes

  • SUSE NeuVector — where it wins

    • Free open-source image and registry scanning
    • Runtime protection, segmentation, and admission control
    • Multi-cluster management with CI/CD integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment limits platform coverage
    • Requires teams to operate the security platform
    • Policy breadth may exceed narrow security needs
  • AccuKnox8.8/10 · Free plan · pricing on request · 30-day trial

    Broad Kubernetes and cloud workload security with a free plan and custom-quote pricing.

    Visit AccuKnoxFull verdict →
  • SUSE NeuVector8.7/10 · Open source

    A broad self-hosted security platform for teams protecting Kubernetes and container environments.

    Visit SUSE NeuVectorFull verdict →

More comparisons

All kubernetes security software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update