iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The International Criminal Court (ICC) can issue arrest warrants and ask states to arrest and surrender suspects, but it cannot make arrests itself. The Court has no police force. In practice, national authorities must act on its requests. If a state does not comply, the ICC can make a formal finding and refer the matter to the Assembly of States Parties or, in certain cases, the UN Security Council—but that referral does not itself produce an arrest.
Can the ICC arrest someone itself?
No. The ICC has legal authority to issue warrants and request cooperation, but no independent police or enforcement force to execute them. Arrests depend on authorities in the relevant country. The Court explains this limit in its description of how it works.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
International Law | $43.68 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
International Law: A Very Short Introduction | $12.08 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
International Law: Norms, Actors, Process [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook) | $141.72 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
International Law | $77.45 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
International Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook) | $173.00 | Buy on Amazon |
This is the difference between the Court’s legal authority and its operational capacity: judges can authorize a warrant, but the ICC cannot send officers into a country to seize a suspect.
How does an ICC arrest warrant lead to an arrest?
Judges decide whether to issue a warrant
The Prosecutor requests a warrant, and judges decide whether the legal conditions are met. The Office of the Prosecutor says judges may issue one when there are reasonable grounds to believe the person committed the alleged crime and arrest is necessary to ensure the person appears in court, prevent obstruction or danger to proceedings, or prevent continuation of the alleged crime. See the Office of the Prosecutor’s explanation.
#1 Best Overall
The Court asks a state to arrest and surrender the person
The ICC can send an arrest-and-surrender request to a state where the person may be found. Under Article 89 of the Rome Statute, States Parties must comply with such requests in accordance with Part 9 of the Statute and their national procedures. Article 88 requires States Parties to ensure they have domestic procedures for the forms of cooperation set out in Part 9. Police and judicial authorities in the country—not ICC officers—carry out the arrest and transfer.
The Statute uses surrender for a state’s delivery of a person to the ICC. It distinguishes this from extradition, which is delivery from one state to another. An ICC request is therefore not simply an ordinary bilateral extradition request. The rules appear in Part 9 of the Rome Statute.
Rank #2
Which countries have to cooperate?
States Parties
States Parties have a general treaty obligation to cooperate fully with the Court under Article 86 and must comply with arrest-and-surrender requests under Article 89, subject to the Statute and national procedures. The ICC’s request is not executed automatically: domestic authorities must take the action required in that country.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Non-party states
A non-party state is not subject to the same general cooperation obligation simply because the ICC has issued a warrant. It may cooperate through an ad hoc arrangement, an agreement, or another applicable legal basis. A Security Council referral or other situation-specific rules can also matter. Where an arrangement or agreement applies and a state fails to cooperate, the Court may inform the Assembly of States Parties or, in a Security Council-referred situation, the Security Council. The legal basis must be considered for the particular state and situation.
Rank #3
What happens if a country refuses to arrest someone?
Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute allows the ICC to find that a state failed to comply with a request when that failure prevents the Court from exercising its functions and powers. The Court may then refer the matter to the Assembly of States Parties. If the Security Council referred the situation to the Court, the matter may instead be referred to the Security Council.
A finding and referral are institutional responses, not an order that ICC officers can enforce. Article 87(7) does not create an automatic arrest or a uniform sanction imposed directly by the Court. Whether the suspect is arrested still depends on state action.
Rank #4
What do actual non-cooperation cases show?
| State and suspect | What the ICC or Assembly recorded | What it illustrates |
|---|---|---|
| Jordan and Omar Al-Bashir | On 11 December 2017, the ICC said Pre-Trial Chamber II found that Jordan failed to comply with the Statute by not arresting and surrendering Al-Bashir while he was in Jordan for the League of Arab States summit on 29 March 2017. The Chamber referred the matter to the Assembly of States Parties and the UN Security Council. ICC announcement | A formal finding and referral did not amount to the Court carrying out an arrest. |
| Mongolia and Vladimir Putin | The Assembly of States Parties’ official non-cooperation register lists an ICC finding concerning Mongolia’s failure to cooperate with the request to arrest and surrender Putin. Assembly register | The register documents non-cooperation; it does not mean the ICC can execute a warrant itself. |
| Tajikistan and Vladimir Putin | An ICC Pre-Trial Chamber finding dated 19 March 2026 concluded Tajikistan did not comply with the request to arrest and surrender Putin and referred the matter to the Assembly of States Parties. On 7 May 2026, the ICC Presidency announced it had referred the finding to the Assembly President. ICC announcement | Even a recorded finding and referral do not themselves bring about an arrest. |
Why can’t every case be treated the same way?
The duty to cooperate depends on the state’s relationship to the Rome Statute and the legal basis for the situation. The Statute also addresses consultation and immunity issues, and domestic procedures apply to requests. These factors can raise complex legal questions, so a non-cooperation finding in one case should not be taken as proof that every state faces identical obligations or circumstances.
Recommended Free Tools
There is no overall enforcement percentage established by the cited official materials. The examples above are case-specific; they do not support a general success rate for ICC warrants.
Quick Recap
How should you interpret an ICC warrant?
- A warrant is not an arrest. It is a judicial decision that permits the Court to request a person’s arrest and surrender.
- Execution relies on states. For a State Party, treaty duties and national procedures govern cooperation; for a non-party, identify the applicable legal basis.
- Non-compliance has a formal route. The ICC can make a finding and refer the matter to the appropriate institution, but it has no force to carry out the arrest.
- The status of a warrant or cooperation proceeding can change. Check current ICC and Assembly of States Parties records for developments.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

