Version 0.26 of the working document “Mapping of IPP Attributes to JDF/1.1 Product Intent and Process Resources” records a narrow change: it updated examples for spot-name-aliases and spot-name-mapping. The revision did not introduce a new protocol or describe a wholesale redesign. Its date needs one qualification: the change-log entry is labeled January 17, 2003, but says the changes followed a joint review held Friday, January 17, 2002.
What changed on January 17, 2003?
The version 0.26 change log says: “Updated the examples in ‘spot-name-aliases’ and ‘spot-name-mapping’.” It identifies the revision as January 17, 2003, while the preceding review-context sentence names Friday, January 17, 2002. Those are the dates as printed in the document; they should not be silently treated as the same date.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
THE HEART OF GOD: A Complete Collection | $14.95 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Adopting Internet Printing Protocol for Windows: Seamlessly Transition Microsoft Printer Networks to... | $50.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Color with the Cats | $7.45 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
The Heart of God: Book of Salvation | $6.50 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Prisoner's in Limbo IPP Sentences | $14.00 | Buy on Amazon |
The distinction matters because the January 17 entry describes updated examples, not the introduction of these mapping areas. The immediately preceding January 6 entry says that spot-name-aliases and spot-name-mapping had been added, along with corresponding JDF/1.2 additions.
What did the mapping document cover?
The working document compared IPP 1.1 job-creation attributes and extensions with several print-ticket and production-workflow models. Its stated scope included:
#1 Best Overall
- JDF 1.1 Product Intent
- JDF 1.1 Digital Printing combined process
- JDF 1.0 IDPrinting process
- Job Ticket API (JTAPI)
- Common Unix Printing System (CUPS)
- PODi PPML Job Ticket
It also reported coverage percentages for alternative printing semantics and briefly described IPP attributes with references to more detailed definitions. The title’s emphasis on JDF Product Intent is therefore only part of the work: the mapping also addressed process resources and compared other job-ticket approaches.
What do “spot-name-aliases” and “spot-name-mapping” mean here?
These names identify a color-related mapping area in the document. The change log establishes that the two items were added earlier and that version 0.26 revised their examples. It does not, by itself, specify the individual alias rules, mapping values, or example content, so those details cannot be inferred from the revision note alone.
Rank #2
At the level supported by the document’s description, the update concerns how spot-color names and mappings are illustrated across the relevant job-ticket representations. It is an examples update within an existing part of the mapping, not evidence that the entire color model or interoperability approach changed.
Was this an official JDF standard?
No: version 0.26 is described as a working mapping document for a Digital Printing Interoperability Conformance Specification. It is useful as a record of how its authors compared IPP semantics with JDF and other print-workflow systems, but it should not be mistaken for a standalone consumer product or a retail offering.
Rank #3
JDF itself is an XML-based industry standard for exchanging product and production information across graphic-arts workflows. CIP4’s standards work includes JDF and XJDF specifications, schemas, examples, and interoperability conformance specifications. The status of JDF as a broader standard does not make every working document that maps to it an adopted standard.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How does the 2003 mapping relate to later IPP/JDF work?
The 2003 document is an earlier interoperability effort: it maps IPP job-creation attributes into JDF product-intent and process-resource concepts while comparing other job-ticket systems. Later work continued the broader standards question. The Printer Working Group lists PWG 5199.6-2017, “Mapping CIP4 JDF to PWG Job Ticket v1.0 (JDFMAP),” among its publications.
The later JDFMAP title indicates a subsequent effort to connect CIP4 JDF with the PWG Job Ticket. It should not be treated as simply a renamed or versioned continuation of the 2003 document: the titles describe different mapping targets, and the 2003 change log alone does not establish a direct technical lineage.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →
