Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsUsually, a planet orbiting a massive star is not expected to survive when that star goes supernova. But planets can later exist around the stellar remnant: some may form from post-explosion debris, while others may be captured into a system that contains a neutron star. A planet found around a pulsar therefore does not, by itself, prove it survived the pulsar’s birth explosion.
What happens to a planet orbiting the star that explodes?
The supernova is expected to incinerate or severely disrupt planets in the exploding star’s original system. The exact outcome can depend on the system and a planet’s orbit, so this is a general expectation rather than a rule that establishes the fate of every possible planet. NASA/JPL describes planets around stars that became pulsars as having been incinerated; NASA’s account of the pulsar PSR B1257+12 likewise says its planets could not have survived their progenitor’s explosion.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Astronomy Book (DK Big Ideas) | $12.15 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
National Geographic Stargazer's Atlas: The Ultimate Guide to the Night Sky | $36.70 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
National Geographic Backyard Guide to the Night Sky, 2nd Edition | $11.43 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Universe, Third Edition | $17.71 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Astronomy: A Self-Teaching Guide, Eighth Edition | $14.67 | Buy on Amazon |
The key distinction is between a planet’s present location and its history. Finding a world orbiting a neutron star does not show that it remained in orbit through the supernova.
How can planets exist around a pulsar?
A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star, a compact remnant left by the collapse of a massive star. Planets can be associated with pulsars through more than one route: they may form from material left after the explosion, or they may later be captured into a system containing a neutron star.
#1 Best Overall
Planets that formed after the explosion: PSR B1257+12
Astronomer Aleksander Wolszczan discovered planets orbiting the pulsar PSR B1257+12 in 1992. NASA identifies three planets in the system and says they likely formed after the supernova from a surrounding disk of gas and dust. They are examples of planets around a stellar remnant, not survivors that stayed in orbit around the star that exploded. NASA Science: “Chapter 7: Death and New Life”.
A dusty disk that might form planets: 4U 0142+61
In 2006, NASA/JPL reported that the Spitzer Space Telescope detected a warm dusty disk around the X-ray pulsar 4U 0142+61, about 13,000 light-years away in the constellation Cassiopeia. The dust may be fallback debris from the explosion and could represent an early stage of a second-generation planetary system. The disk was observed; planets forming from it were a possibility, not a reported detection. NASA/JPL’s Spitzer report.
A planet captured into a system with a neutron star: PSR B1620-26
NASA Hubble describes a planet with a mass of 2.5 Jupiters in a system containing a neutron star and a white dwarf. The proposed history is different from the PSR B1257+12 case: the planet likely began orbiting a sun-like star and was later captured into a wider orbit around the pair. NASA says it survived supernova radiation and shockwaves in the cluster’s history, but this is not a straightforward example of a planet remaining around its own host star through that star’s explosion. The capture history is a proposed reconstruction. NASA Hubble: “Oldest Known Planet Identified”.
| System or evidence | What happened to the planet or material? | What is established? |
|---|---|---|
| PSR B1257+12 | Planets likely formed after the supernova. | NASA identifies three planets and describes their post-explosion origin as likely. |
| 4U 0142+61 | A dusty disk may be material from which planets could form. | Spitzer detected the disk; planets forming from it were not reported as detected. |
| PSR B1620-26 | A planet likely began around a sun-like star and was later captured into a system with a neutron star and white dwarf. | The planet is described as 2.5 Jupiter masses; its capture history is proposed. |
Can a supernova harm planets around nearby stars?
Yes. A planet does not have to orbit the star that explodes to be affected by the event. A NASA Chandra article summarizing X-ray observations of 31 supernovae reports that potentially lethal X-ray doses could reach Earth-like planets as far as about 160 light-years away. The study’s estimated effects include ozone loss, greater exposure to ultraviolet radiation from the planet’s host star, nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere, and ecological harm.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →The 160-light-year distance is the reported reach of this study, not a universal safe-distance boundary for every supernova or planetary environment. NASA notes that observations are sparse, particularly for supernovae interacting strongly with their surroundings, and calls for further observations. The article describes modeled or estimated effects; it does not report seeing a specific exoplanet undergo them. NASA Chandra’s 2023 summary.
Can supernova remnants help make future planets?
Supernovae destroy nearby worlds, but they also return material to space that can contribute to later generations of stars and planets. NASA reported that dust in the Sagittarius A East supernova remnant survived later shock waves and was flowing into the interstellar medium, where it could become seed material for new stars and planets.
Rank #4
For the studied cloud, Ryan Lau of Cornell University said it contained enough dust to make 7,000 Earths. That is a comparison of the cloud’s estimated dust mass, not a count of planets that formed. NASA’s 2015 SOFIA report.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Have planets been found around stars that are about to explode?
NASA’s educational page says planets have not yet been found around supergiant stars expected to explode. Their rarity and brightness make them difficult to study, so the lack of detections is not evidence that such stars have no planets. NASA Science.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
