Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsiTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
New Zealand’s Auditor-General has declined a request to investigate the Government’s proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility for now, but the office remains interested in the plans. RNZ reports that officials are still developing the proposal’s case, including how it would be funded, and that later scrutiny could examine its costs and whether alternatives were considered.
Why isn’t the Auditor-General investigating now?
RNZ reports that the proposal is still being developed, including its case for proceeding and arrangements for paying for it. The office has therefore declined to open an inquiry at this stage. That is a decision about timing, not a statement that the project is exempt from future scrutiny or that an investigation will definitely happen.
Consumer and climate groups requested an inquiry, raising concerns about transparency and value for money, according to RNZ. Those are the requesters’ concerns; they are not findings that the Government has acted improperly or wasted public money. RNZ’s account is the available source for the request and the office’s response; the underlying letter was not available here.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What is the proposed LNG facility meant to do?
RNZ reports that the Government’s proposal is intended to address energy-security risks in dry years, when hydroelectric generation can be constrained by low water levels. That describes the stated rationale, not an independently established finding that a facility is necessary or that LNG is the best solution.
#1 Best Overall
The available reporting does not establish the facility’s final design or capacity, its cost, how its costs would be allocated, or which provider would build or supply it. No completed business case or official project cost estimate is available in the cited material.
What could a later review examine?
RNZ says scrutiny could become relevant after a provider is selected. Possible issues include whether the project’s costs are justified and whether alternatives were properly assessed. The Auditor-General has not, in the reported material, committed to a future audit or set out a final scope.
Rank #2
- 2024 OSHA Construction Safety Book is the seventh edition with the new OSHA HazCom final rule on 5/20/24. While the rule takes effect 7/19/24, the compliance dates don’t begin until 1/19/26 per 29 CFR 1910.1200(j).
- Construction Site Book offers quick access to essential OSHA regulations, jobsite hazards, and practical safety tips. It also helps employees identify hazards and prevent injuries and illnesses.
- Features easy-to-read format, full-color images, chapter quizzes with answer key, and comes in a compact size making it a convenient reference for employees.
- Critical topics include Confined Space Entry; Cranes & Derricks; Electrical Safety; Emergency Response; Ergonomics & Back Safety; Excavations; Fall Protection; First Aid & Bloodborne Pathogens; HazCom; Health & Wellness; Jobsite Exposures; Lockout/Tagout; Ladders & Stairways; Materials Handling/Storage; Motor Vehicles; PPE; Scaffolds; Site Safety & Security; Slips, Trips & Falls; Tool Safety; Welding, Cutting & Brazing; and Work Zone Safety.
- Specifications: 5 1/4” x 7 1/4", English, Soft bound. 7th Edition. Copyright 2024.
The Office of the Auditor-General provides independent assurance to Parliament and the public about public entities’ authority, probity, performance, accountability and use of resources. Its mandate concerns the activities of public entities and whether those activities are effective, efficient and consistent with applicable policy. That general role provides context for possible scrutiny; it is not a finding about the LNG proposal. See the Office of the Auditor-General’s description of its role.
In a report on major infrastructure investment decisions, the Office emphasized rigorous decision-making, transparency, documentation, public reporting and accountability for public spending. That report addressed other programmes, not LNG, but those principles help explain why a project’s business case, cost assumptions and procurement record could matter if the LNG proposal is examined later. Read the Office’s report on major infrastructure investment decisions.
Rank #3
What remains unknown
RNZ’s reporting describes work still under way on the case for LNG. The information available does not establish:
- the facility’s final design, capacity or timing;
- a project cost estimate or whole-of-life cost;
- how the project would be financed or who would ultimately bear the costs;
- the procurement route or the provider to be selected;
- which alternatives have been assessed, or how they compare; or
- whether the Auditor-General will open an inquiry once a provider is selected.
Until those details are settled and documented, the proposal’s value for money and relative merits cannot be treated as established. The reported decision leaves open the possibility of later scrutiny without guaranteeing it.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
- Used Book in Good Condition
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
