Recommended Free Tools
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Drake removed “Taylor Made Freestyle” from his social media accounts after Tupac Shakur’s estate threatened legal action over an AI-generated imitation of Tupac’s voice. The estate’s April 24, 2024, letter demanded removal and described potential claims; the available reporting does not establish that a lawsuit was filed or that a court ruled the track unlawful.
What happened with “Taylor Made Freestyle”
Drake posted “Taylor Made Freestyle,” a diss track aimed at Kendrick Lamar, on social media on April 19, 2024. The track used AI-generated vocal imitations of both Tupac Shakur and Snoop Dogg. In the sequence of the 2024 feud, it followed Drake’s “Push Ups” and preceded Lamar’s “Euphoria,” according to the Associated Press.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
2Pac Greatest Hits | $19.17 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
2Pac Greatest Hits | Buy on Amazon | |
| 3 |
|
The Best Of 2Pac - Part 1: Thug | $11.89 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
2Pac Greatest Hits Explicit Lyrics Edition (1998) Audio CD | $23.68 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Me Against the World | $9.78 | Buy on Amazon |
On April 24, Tupac’s estate, through its lawyer Howard E. King, sent Drake a cease-and-desist letter. After the threat, Drake removed the track from his social accounts, Billboard reported. Representatives for Drake and the estate declined to comment to Billboard after the removal. The reporting places the removal around April 25–26, but does not establish an exact hour.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesWhat Tupac’s estate demanded
The April 24 letter demanded that Drake confirm by noon Pacific on April 25 that he had removed the track from platforms he controlled and taken steps to remove it elsewhere. It also asked him to explain how the sound-alike was created, including who was involved and what recordings or data may have been used. The letter threatened legal remedies if Drake did not comply.
#1 Best Overall
- 2Pac's Greatest Hits is the posthumous collection originally released in November 1998
King wrote: “The Estate is deeply dismayed and disappointed by your unauthorized use of Tupac’s voice and personality.” The letter also asserted that the track could falsely imply Tupac or the estate endorsed its lyrics. Its claims and demands are the estate’s position, not a court’s findings.
What legal claims did the letter raise?
Publicity and personality rights
The estate argued that using an AI-generated imitation of Tupac’s voice violated publicity and related legal rights. These kinds of claims generally concern control over the commercial or other use of a person’s identity. The letter’s argument was that the voice imitation used Tupac’s identity without authorization and could mislead listeners about endorsement.
Rank #2
- 2Pac Records
Copyright claims involving recordings
The letter also said the estate would consider copyright claims relating to recordings it owned. That theory concerns potential use of copyrighted recordings as inputs in creating the imitation, rather than simply the resemblance of the resulting voice. The public reporting does not identify the recordings, data, AI system, or operator involved, so it does not establish that copyrighted material was used.
Billboard’s contemporaneous coverage noted uncertainty about how publicity rights and copyright apply to AI-generated vocals in creative works. The letter’s threatened claims should therefore not be read as proof of infringement.
Rank #3
- The Best Of 2Pac - Part 1: Thug includes nine classics, plus one previously unreleased track ("Resist The Temptation") and a new remix of "Dear Mama" featuring Anthony Hamilton
Was Drake sued, and was the AI Tupac voice ruled illegal?
The available reporting documents a cease-and-desist demand and a threat of legal action, followed by removal of the track. It does not show that Tupac’s estate filed a lawsuit, that the parties disclosed a settlement, or that a court decided whether the imitation was lawful. Drake’s removal of the track, on its own, is not a judicial ruling or an admission that the estate’s claims were valid.
The record also does not establish which AI tool was used, who operated it, or what data trained or generated the voice imitation. Naming a particular service or asserting that the model used Tupac recordings would go beyond what the reporting establishes.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Key dates
- April 19, 2024: Drake posted “Taylor Made Freestyle” on social media, according to contemporaneous coverage.
- April 24, 2024: King sent a letter demanding removal confirmation by noon Pacific the following day and requesting information about how the imitation was created.
- April 25–26, 2024: Billboard reported that Drake removed the track after the threat. The coverage does not establish the precise removal time.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
