What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Akorri’s BalancePoint was enterprise software designed to show how applications depended on server, storage, and network resources—and to help IT teams anticipate how infrastructure changes might affect application performance. Network World described it on January 8, 2007, as a way to manage application delivery across technology silos, not as a tool for organizing consumer apps.
What Akorri BalancePoint did
BalancePoint analyzed relationships between applications and the server and storage resources assigned to them. Its purpose was to help administrators see where a performance problem might arise and assess the operational effect of changes such as adding capacity or increasing usage.
The distinction was the cross-domain view. Traditional capacity or storage tools might show where data was stored or how much capacity remained; BalancePoint aimed to connect those infrastructure facts to application performance. Akorri founder and CTO Richard Corley described the problem in contemporary 2007 comments: “As we talked with customers, one of the problems we saw was a lack of visibility across technology silos.” He argued that data-center management required a holistic view of storage, servers, networks, and applications. Enterprise Management Associates senior analyst Mike Karp similarly said the product could “cross-correlate systems, storage and network resource management.” These were assessments made at the time, not current endorsements.
How it was deployed and what it supported in 2007
Network World reported that BalancePoint came preinstalled on a rack-mounted, server-based appliance that connected to an IP network. Its compatibility list was a snapshot of the product as reported in January 2007—not a current support matrix.
#1 Best Overall
- Databases: Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, and IBM DB2.
- Messaging: Microsoft Exchange and IBM Lotus Notes.
- File services: Windows Common Internet File System (CIFS) and Unix/Linux Network File System (NFS).
- Server monitoring: Windows, AIX, HP-UX, and Solaris. Linux support was described as planned for later in that quarter, not as already available.
- Storage arrays: EMC, IBM, Hitachi Data Systems, Engenio, HP, and Network Appliance.
Those names describe reported compatibility at the time. They should not be used to infer that the product works with current versions or remains supported.
What it cost, and what the period’s figures mean
Network World reported in January 2007 that BalancePoint version 1.3 started at $30,000, while a typical enterprise-size installation started at about $250,000. The article said pricing varied with the operating systems and applications in use and the storage capacity being managed. These are historical prices, not present-day quotes or evidence of current availability.
The same report attributed two brownout-related figures to The InfoPro: as many as 80% of surveyed Fortune 1000 companies tended to add excess server and storage capacity to protect application performance, and almost 75% of surveyed companies had at least one application brownout per month. Network World’s available account does not give the survey year or methodology, so these figures are historical context with an unspecified survey date—not current benchmarks.
What happened after Akorri was acquired
NetApp announced on February 1, 2011, that it had completed its acquisition of Akorri in an all-cash transaction for approximately $60 million. NetApp characterized BalancePoint as software for identifying performance bottlenecks and improving storage-capacity planning, and said the acquisition added performance-capacity analytics to its OnCommand management suite, extending analytics across applications, servers, networks, and storage. The announcement said BalancePoint was then available through existing Akorri channel partners; that statement describes availability in 2011 only.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsRank #3
- EXPAND YOUR HORIZONS: 3440 x1440 UltraWide QHD (WQHD) resolution with 21:9 aspect ratio for efficient productivity
- CURVED IMMERSION: The 1500R radius curved VA panel allows for more immersion and better color accuracy. It can also help alleviate eye strain during long hours of working
- RICH COLORS FOR WORK AND PLAY: Ultra Wide-Color technology produces true-to-life images and a wider spectrum of colors with sRBG 123.24 percent , NTSC 99.25 percent color gamut area coverage
- WINDOWS HELLO WEBCAM WITH NOISE-CANCELING MIC: Comes with built-in 5MP webcam, noise canceling microphone, and speakers, perfect for remote working. The webcam is equipped with advanced sensors for Windows Hello facial recognition, which conveniently logs you into your Windows devices in less than 2 seconds
- ONE CABLE IS ALL YOU NEED: USB-C docking transfers high-speed data, high-resolution video signal, and power to your laptop (up to 65W of Power Delivery support) via a single USB-C cable. Play and work in high resolution while simultaneously charging your notebook
NetApp’s fiscal 2011 filing records January 31, 2011, as the acquisition date and gives a total purchase price of $62.3 million. The filing’s figure and the press release’s approximate $60 million are differently expressed source figures, so they should be kept attributed rather than treated as identical.
Is Akorri BalancePoint still available?
The available sources do not establish whether BalancePoint is currently sold or supported, or whether it has a direct successor. NetApp’s 2011 announcement about OnCommand integration does not answer those present-day questions. Readers evaluating a current product or migration path should consult current NetApp documentation rather than assume BalancePoint remains available or infer a successor from the acquisition announcement.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to understand its place in the market
Network World named EMC, HP, IBM, and Onaro as competitors in the period, but did not provide enough comparative information to rank them. A fair historical comparison would ask whether each product mapped application dependencies across infrastructure domains, predicted the effects of resource changes, supported the relevant server and storage environment, offered capacity-planning or troubleshooting features, and how it was deployed and priced. The report supports BalancePoint’s position in that category, not a claim that it outperformed those competitors.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
