Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

Uzbekistan recorded a $13.4 billion trade deficit in the first half of 2026: exports were $15.4 billion, down 8.6% year over year, while imports reached $28.8 billion, up 24%. That imbalance can increase demand for foreign currency, but it does not by itself mean the Uzbek sum will fall or prices will rise. The effect depends on foreign-currency inflows, financing, policy, and how businesses pass costs on to buyers.

What the latest figures say

The Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan’s external-sector review, published September 29, 2026, reports that first-half exports totaled $15.4 billion and imports totaled $28.8 billion. The resulting trade deficit was $13.4 billion. The figures cover six months, not a full-year result. Central Bank H1 2026 review

Measure First half of 2026 Change from first half of 2025
Exports $15.4 billion Down 8.6%
Imports $28.8 billion Up 24%
Trade balance -$13.4 billion Deficit

The headline export decline does not mean every export category shrank. Lower gold exports drove much of the fall in total exports; non-gold exports increased 27% and services exports increased 45%. The Central Bank says import growth reflected machinery and equipment, vehicles, chemical and mineral products, and food, amid ongoing investment and strong domestic consumer demand. Central Bank H1 2026 review

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Why is Uzbekistan importing more than it exports?

Imports can rise for different reasons, and the figures alone do not show that every import has the same economic effect. Machinery and equipment may be associated with investment; consumer goods and food can reflect household demand. The Central Bank cited both sustained investment activity and strong consumer demand in explaining first-half import growth. Those data do not establish that a particular imported machine will raise future production or exports.

Export totals also depend on what is being sold and the prices those goods command. Gold’s role in the first-half decline means the overall export number can fall even while non-gold goods and services exports are growing. In its report on 2025, the Central Bank also noted the influence of global commodity prices on goods-export values and growth in services such as travel, transport, and IT. A change in the value of exports therefore need not equal an identical change in production volumes. Central Bank 2025 annual report

How a trade deficit differs from a current-account deficit

A trade deficit means imports of goods and services exceed exports over a particular period. The current account is broader: it also includes primary income and secondary income, including transfers and remittances. Positive income flows can reduce the current-account deficit even when the trade balance remains negative.

Rank #2

That difference is visible in the first-half figures. The Central Bank reported positive primary-income and secondary-income balances of $1.9 billion and $5.3 billion, respectively. These partly offset the $13.4 billion trade deficit, leaving an overall current-account deficit of about $6.2 billion. The Bank says that current-account deficit was financed mainly through direct, portfolio, and other investment flows. Central Bank H1 2026 review

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Full-year 2025 figures tell a related but not directly comparable story. Goods-and-services exports rose 23% to $32.3 billion, while imports rose 20% to $52.2 billion, leaving a $19.9 billion trade deficit. The current-account deficit was $5.8 billion, or 3.9% of GDP, compared with $5.7 billion, or 4.7% of GDP, in 2024. Net secondary income of $13.7 billion and net primary income of about $371 million partly offset the trade gap. Central Bank 2025 annual report

The $13.4 billion figure covers half a year and the $19.9 billion figure covers a full year; neither should be treated as an apples-to-apples comparison. Nor should the first-half figure be doubled to imply a 2026 forecast. Trade and current-account balances are different measures, and income flows can make them move differently.

Will the trade deficit make the Uzbek sum weaker?

It could add pressure, but it does not determine the exchange rate on its own. Importers paying overseas suppliers may need foreign currency. If demand for that currency rises faster than the supply coming from exports, remittances, investment, or other inflows, pressure on the sum can increase. The eventual exchange rate also depends on policy, market expectations, and other balance-of-payments flows.

Recent history shows why a direct cause-and-effect assumption is unreliable. IMF staff reported that the sum appreciated 6.9% against the U.S. dollar in 2025 even as Uzbekistan recorded a trade deficit. That observation does not explain the cause of the appreciation; it illustrates that trade is only one part of the currency picture. IMF April 2026 staff statement

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

A current-account deficit must be matched in the balance of payments by financial flows, reserve transactions, or other accounting entries. For the first half of 2026, the Central Bank identified investment flows as the main financing source. Financing can support the external balance, but the type and durability of those inflows matter when assessing vulnerability.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

Could a weaker sum make prices rise?

If the sum weakens, imported goods and foreign-sourced inputs used by local businesses may cost more in local currency. That can add to inflation pressure, but the impact is not necessarily immediate or uniform. Businesses may absorb some of the increase, rely on existing inventories, or face different competitive and pricing conditions. Administered prices and monetary conditions also affect how exchange-rate changes reach consumers. The trade deficit alone cannot establish a specific price increase for a product.

Inflation can move for reasons beyond imports and the exchange rate. IMF staff reported that end-2025 inflation fell to 7.3% from 9.8% at end-2024, and cited several contributors: fading effects of the May 2024 energy-price increases, currency appreciation, and tight monetary policy. These are reported explanations for disinflation, not evidence that the trade deficit caused the inflation change. IMF April 2026 staff statement

Forecasts should be kept separate from observed results. The IMF’s June 2026 outlook projected a current-account deficit of 3.9% of GDP in 2025, 3.2% in 2026, and 3.6% in 2027. In an April 2026 statement, it said inflation was expected to remain above the Central Bank’s 5% target in 2026 and reach that target in 2027. These are IMF projections, not final outcomes. IMF June 2026 outlook IMF April 2026 staff statement

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Does a trade deficit mean Uzbekistan’s economy is in trouble?

Not by itself. A deficit records that imports exceeded exports during a period; it does not reveal whether imports are supporting investment, whether external financing is sustainable, or whether future export earnings will grow. The Central Bank’s account of import growth includes both investment activity and consumer demand, so the composition and persistence of imports matter alongside the total.

It is also important to distinguish a financing need from a forecast of crisis. A current-account deficit can be financed through investment and other flows, as the Central Bank says occurred in the first half of 2026. A reader assessing risk should look at the balance, the sources of financing, and the currency and reserve picture together rather than infer an outcome from the trade deficit alone.

What indicators should readers watch?

  • Trade balance and composition: Compare exports and imports of goods and services, and check whether changes are driven by gold, other goods, or services.
  • Current account: This includes income flows that can offset the trade balance and gives a broader view of the external balance.
  • Remittances and other income: These can provide foreign-currency inflows and reduce the current-account gap; 2025 net secondary income was $13.7 billion in the Central Bank’s annual figures.
  • Financing flows: Track investment and other inflows, including their composition and persistence. The Central Bank identified investment flows as the main financing for the first-half 2026 current-account deficit.
  • Exchange rate, reserves, and inflation: Follow current Central Bank and IMF releases. The IMF’s June 2026 assessment projected reserves above twelve months of imports by end-2026; that is a forecast, not a reported end-year reserve result. IMF June 2026 outlook Central Bank of Uzbekistan

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.