Recommended Free Tools
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The May 7, 2016 crash near Williston, Florida, involved a Tesla Model S using two driver-assistance features in Tesla’s Autopilot suite: Traffic-Aware Cruise Control and Autosteer. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) found that the truck driver failed to yield and that the Tesla driver was inattentive because of overreliance on automation. It also identified system design that allowed prolonged disengagement from driving as a contributing factor. The case is a reminder that assistance features do not make a car self-driving or remove the driver’s responsibility to watch the road.
The title alone does not uniquely identify a particular crash; this article covers the Williston crash documented in NTSB case HWY16FH018.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
HOMETALL Remote Control Car RC Trucks All Terrain 2WD RC Truck Toy RC Cars | $19.99 | Buy on Amazon |
Was the Tesla on Autopilot when it crashed?
Yes. The NTSB’s review of vehicle performance data found the Tesla was using Traffic-Aware Cruise Control and Autosteer, both part of the Autopilot suite. These features can assist with speed and steering, but the NTSB described them as partial driving automation—not a fully autonomous driving system.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesCalling the car “self-driving” can blur an important distinction: the features were intended to assist a human driver, not take over the entire driving task. The NTSB’s Williston case record identifies the specific functions in use.
#1 Best Overall
- ❄️ All-Weather Durable Body – Made with cold-resistant & impact-proof pvc materials, this boys pickup toy truck is perfect for winter play and holiday gifts!
- 🔋 2 Rechargeable Batteries + Extra Charging Cables – Remote control car can Enjoy up to 1 hour of playtime without frequent battery swaps. (Includes 2x 400mAh batteries + 2 USB cables for convenience!)
- ⚡ High-Speed RC Trucks Thrills (18 KM/H!) – Front-wheel drive for stable racing fun, ideal for kids aged 3+ to compete safely.
- 💡 Cool Adjustable LED Lights – This rc cars for kids is customize multicolor light modes and unique design for an epic nighttime driving experience!
- 👶 Kid-Friendly Ergonomic Remote – Designed for small hands with a comfortable grip, making steering easy & fun!
What happened in the Williston crash?
On May 7, 2016, a Tesla Model S and a tractor-trailer collided near Williston, Florida. The Tesla’s sole occupant died; the truck driver was not injured. The NTSB concluded that the truck driver failed to yield the right of way and that the Tesla driver, overrelying on automation and inattentive, did not react to the truck’s presence.
The agency stated its probable-cause finding as follows: “We determined that the probable cause of the Williston, Florida, crash was the truck driver’s failure to yield the right of way to the car, combined with the car driver’s inattention due to overreliance on vehicle automation, which resulted in the car driver’s lack of reaction to the presence of the truck.”
What did investigators say caused the crash?
The NTSB’s finding did not assign the crash to only one driver or to the car alone. It combined the truck driver’s failure to yield with the Tesla driver’s inattention caused by overreliance on automation. The board also identified a system-design issue: the operational design allowed the driver to disengage from driving for a prolonged period and to use the features inconsistently with manufacturer guidance and warnings.
That distinction matters. A driver’s duty to supervise a driver-assistance system does not erase the role that system design can play in encouraging or permitting misuse. Conversely, identifying a design contribution does not mean the car was operating as a fully autonomous vehicle.
Are Tesla cars self-driving?
Autopilot features that control some steering and speed are examples of partial driving automation, often described as Level 2. The human driver remains responsible for monitoring traffic, understanding the system’s limitations, and being ready to intervene. NHTSA explains that it avoids the term “self-driving” for systems that still require driver interaction because that label can wrongly suggest that a person can stop paying attention.
NHTSA’s Automated Vehicle Safety guidance states: “Every vehicle currently for sale in the United States requires the full attention of the driver at all times for safe operation.” That is the agency’s guidance for vehicles currently for sale in the United States; it should not be read as a claim about every vehicle or system worldwide.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Do I still have to pay attention when driver assistance is on?
Yes. With Level 2 assistance, the driver must keep monitoring the road and be prepared to take control. A system that checks for steering-wheel torque or hand contact cannot establish that the driver is actually watching traffic. In its broader review of four Tesla crashes from May 2016 through March 2019, the NTSB called torque an ineffective proxy for driver engagement.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
That multi-crash review also identified recurring concerns about ineffective driver-engagement monitoring, use outside intended operating conditions, and collision-avoidance limitations in certain scenarios. Those findings describe patterns across the investigations; they do not establish that every vehicle or driver-assistance feature has identical performance.
What is different about developmental self-driving systems?
The NTSB’s overview of automated-driving-system risks discusses issues such as limits in hazard detection and predicting other road users’ movement, automation complacency among safety monitors, and the need for design safeguards and risk mitigation. These are broader concerns about developmental systems, not additional findings about the specific cause of the Williston crash.
The distinction is useful because “automation” covers systems with different roles. A driver-assistance feature that expects continuous human supervision is not equivalent to a system designed to perform the full driving task. In either case, the system’s intended operating conditions and the human role must be clear.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →
