Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Mira Murati, OpenAI’s chief technology officer at the time, was reported to have said in May 2024 that some creative jobs might disappear—and that perhaps they should not have existed if their output was not high quality. The remark was about some jobs, not all creative work, and it was a prediction rather than a measured account of AI’s employment effects.
What did Mira Murati say about creative jobs?
In a report published June 25, 2024, Futurism attributed the remark to Murati during an interview at Dartmouth’s Thayer School of Engineering the previous month. Futurism quoted her as saying, “Some creative jobs maybe will go away,” followed by, “But maybe they shouldn’t have been there in the first place.” The report says it was citing Fortune; the original Dartmouth recording or transcript is not available in the sources cited here, so the wording is best treated as reported rather than independently verified. Read Futurism’s report.
A longer version appears in TechRadar Pro’s retrospective, published June 13, 2026: Murati’s comment was about jobs whose content was “not very high quality.” That qualification matters: the short excerpt can sound like a judgment on creative work generally, while the longer version ties the remark to output quality. TechRadar’s is later reporting, not the original interview transcript. Read TechRadar Pro’s retrospective.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →What does the headline leave out?
“Kill” is the headline’s forceful framing, not the short wording Futurism reproduces. Murati’s reported statement was narrower: some creative jobs might go away, and she speculated that jobs producing low-quality content might not have been necessary. It does not establish that all creative jobs are doomed, that all artists are undeserving of employment, or that AI had already eliminated those jobs.
#1 Best Overall
Futurism also reported Murati’s broader prediction that many jobs would change, some would be lost and others gained, with strictly repetitive work more exposed. Those are forecasts, not employment outcomes measured in the cited coverage. The reports do not provide a verified, scoped employment-impact statistic to quantify how many jobs AI will remove.
How does Bret Taylor’s response fit in?
A separate Washington Post transcript from June 25, 2024, records host Lizza Dwoskin asking Bret Taylor about Murati’s remarks and how many jobs AI might replace. Taylor—not Murati—said near-term displacement was possible if software adoption outpaced reskilling, while expressing the expectation that new jobs would emerge over the longer term. He described the challenge this way: “I think the uncomfortable part of this technology is how quickly the technology will be adopted and how quickly we as society can re-skill into those new jobs.” Read the Washington Post transcript.
Taylor’s comments help frame the employment debate, but they are not a continuation of Murati’s Dartmouth interview. The two points address different questions: Murati’s reported remark concerns some creative jobs and the quality of their output; Taylor emphasizes the pace of adoption and whether workers can move into new roles quickly enough.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What can readers conclude about AI and creative work?
- The reported remark was made by Murati while she was OpenAI CTO, in a Dartmouth interview in May 2024, according to coverage published the following month.
- The remark concerns some creative jobs, with a later reported version qualifying it by the quality of the content produced.
- Statements about jobs changing, disappearing or being created are predictions in these reports, not measured results.
- The cited coverage does not establish a reliable number for how many jobs AI will replace.
TIME’s September 2024 profile also describes the public reaction to Murati’s comments and identifies her as CTO during the relevant period. TIME disclosed a licensing and technology agreement with OpenAI. Read TIME’s profile.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
