iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The Strategic Support Force (SSF) was a broad People’s Liberation Army organization, not simply a Chinese equivalent of U.S. Cyber Command. A 2017 CyberScoop article argued that its consolidation of cyber, space, electronic-warfare and information capabilities could help China challenge the United States in emerging military domains. That was an attributed forecast, not proof that China had overtaken the United States. The SSF designation was canceled in April 2024, when China announced a new Information Support Force and a reorganization of the PLA’s services and arms.
What the 2017 CyberScoop article argued
Chris Bing’s June 22, 2017, report described the SSF as a force established in 2015 by consolidating existing organizations and capabilities. Its reported remit extended across cyber operations, space, electronic warfare, and information or psychological operations. The idea was organizational integration: bring capabilities relevant to future military competition under a broader structure rather than create every capability from scratch. CyberScoop’s original report captures the debate at that moment in China’s military reforms; it should not be read as a current PLA organization chart.
The article’s “supersede” framing came from expert assessments about potential and future competition. Elsa Kania said in 2017 that, if successful in technological and defense innovation, the SSF “could become a vital force for future military competition” as China sought to overtake the U.S. military in critical emerging technologies and strategic domains. The conditional wording matters: it was a forecast, not a measured finding that the SSF had already surpassed a U.S. counterpart.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Why it was not a one-to-one counterpart to U.S. Cyber Command
CyberScoop’s comparison was deliberately wide. The SSF’s reported missions could overlap with functions performed across several U.S. bodies, including U.S. Cyber Command, the National Security Agency, military services, the Department of Homeland Security, NASA and the State Department. These organizations have different authorities and purposes; naming them together illustrates the breadth of the comparison, not institutional equivalence.
#1 Best Overall
U.S. Cyber Command is therefore only one point of comparison. To assess the 2017 claim fairly, distinguish three questions:
- Mission scope: Which cyber, space, electronic and information functions were attributed to the SSF, and which U.S. bodies performed related functions?
- Command relationships: Where did each organization sit in its own country’s military and government structure?
- Time: Is the comparison about the SSF as described in 2017 or the PLA structure announced in 2024?
Similar labels or overlapping missions do not establish equal capabilities, authority or effectiveness.
Rank #2
What could—and could not—be measured in 2017
The article itself reported a major uncertainty. Kania said it was difficult to produce a credible estimate of the SSF’s personnel or budget. CyberScoop supplied no definitive force-size or spending figure that would prove a U.S.-China advantage, and the available evidence does not establish a quantitative score for whether the SSF “superseded” U.S. organizations. Claims about its potential should not be converted into confirmed measures of strength.
The 2017 report remains useful as a record of how analysts and former officials understood the SSF during its early years. It is not, by itself, a current assessment of Chinese or U.S. military capability.
What changed in April 2024
On April 19, 2024, China announced the Information Support Force and canceled the SSF’s official designation. The PRC Ministry of National Defense said the new force was directly led by the Central Military Commission. Its explanation of the new system lists four services—the Army, Navy, Air Force and Rocket Force—and four arms: the Aerospace Force, Cyberspace Force, Information Support Force and Joint Logistic Support Force. See the Ministry’s announcement and its explanation of the services-and-arms structure.
The U.S. Department of Defense’s 2024 China military report also records the SSF’s dissolution and the Information Support Force’s establishment on April 19. A senior U.S. defense official said the former SSF’s components had continued to mature China’s space enterprise before the dissolution, and that work continued afterward. The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission’s 2024 executive summary presents the before-and-after structure. These sources establish a reorganization, but they do not publicly map every mission, unit or asset to a successor organization.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to read the claim today
Use “Strategic Support Force” for the former PLA organization discussed in the 2017 article, not as the current name for China’s cyber command. The 2024 structure names a Cyberspace Force as one of the PLA’s arms and an Information Support Force as another; the public descriptions cited here do not establish that either one is a simple replacement for the former SSF or disclose a complete transfer of its responsibilities.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11For current comparisons with U.S. organizations, keep formal structure separate from operational performance. The documented reorganization clarifies what China announced, but it does not quantify current relative cyber capabilities or establish that China has overtaken the United States. The 2024 U.S. Department of Defense report and the briefing transcript provide current institutional context; neither turns the 2017 forecast into a measured result.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
