Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

According to a report based on an unnamed official who said they were present, Donald Trump asked Elon Musk’s Grok chatbot how Venezuelans might react if U.S. forces captured or deposed Nicolás Maduro. The alleged exchange took place at a private White House meeting in December 2025. No transcript or prompt log has been made public, so the conversation—and Grok’s reported answer—remain unverified.

What Trump reportedly asked Grok

TIME reported that Trump spent hours questioning Musk’s chatbot about his presidency and legacy during the December 2025 meeting. One reported question concerned how Venezuelans would respond if Maduro were captured or removed from power. The Independent, EFE and TechCrunch also carried accounts of the consultation.

In those accounts, Grok allegedly predicted that many Venezuelans would welcome Maduro’s removal because he was unpopular or repressive. That was a reported chatbot prediction, not the result of a public-opinion poll or evidence that Venezuelans as a whole supported a U.S. operation.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

What is—and is not—documented

  • The account comes from an unnamed official described as having attended the meeting.
  • No transcript, prompt log or direct confirmation from Trump, Musk, xAI or the White House has been reported.
  • The available account does not establish exactly what wording Trump used, how Grok generated its answer, or whether the answer influenced a policy decision.

Did Grok encourage the operation?

The reporting does not establish that Grok caused, encouraged or shaped the decision to capture Maduro. It describes an alleged consultation before the operation, but a question about possible public reaction is not by itself evidence of a recommendation to act or of a causal link to the later decision.

The alleged prediction also should not be confused with what happened afterward. TIME’s later reporting described Caracas as tense, not uniformly celebratory. One resident told the publication: “People only go out for what’s essential, and they go back home before it is dark.” That account is a reported observation, not a measure of Venezuelan public opinion as a whole.

What happened after the reported meeting

On January 3, 2026, U.S. forces conducted an operation in Venezuela and took Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, into U.S. custody, according to TIME. TIME reported that the ground assault lasted less than 30 minutes and involved more than 150 aircraft operating from multiple bases.

After the capture, Trump said: “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition.” The operation drew international condemnation and concern. TIME’s reaction roundup reported criticism or alarm from Russia, China, the United Nations and several regional governments. U.N. spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said the secretary-general was “deeply alarmed” by the military action and its “potential worrying implications for the region.”

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

Was the capture legal?

The available reporting does not settle that question. TIME said congressional and international critics questioned whether Trump had authority to order the operation without explicit congressional approval, while reactions also raised concerns about Venezuelan sovereignty and international law. Those objections are not, on their own, a judicial ruling on the operation’s legality. The reported Grok exchange likewise provides no legal determination.

The headline’s use of “kidnapping” is a contested characterization. The reported events were a U.S. military operation in which Maduro and Flores were seized and taken into U.S. custody; the legality and legitimacy of that action were disputed in the reactions TIME reported.

How to read the story

Question What the reporting establishes What it does not establish
Did Trump consult Grok? TIME attributed the account to an unnamed official said to have been at the December 2025 meeting; other outlets repeated it. A public transcript, prompt log or direct confirmation.
What did Grok say? Reports say it predicted many Venezuelans would welcome Maduro’s removal. A verified answer, a representative poll or proof that Grok advised the operation.
Did the capture happen? TIME reported that U.S. forces captured Maduro and Flores on January 3, 2026. That the alleged chatbot conversation caused the operation or resolved its legal status.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.