iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
SOAX is the clearest fit when a scraping project depends on granular country, city or ISP targeting. Oxylabs is a candidate for enterprise-scale acquisition where its broader proxy suite and procurement needs matter. Treat Bright Data as conditional and verify mobile-proxy availability in your target country; verify Decodo’s current mobile product directly before committing. The available figures do not support an apples-to-apples performance or price ranking across these four providers.
How the four providers compare
This shortlist is best read as a set of candidates to validate against a particular scraping job—not as a measured league table. The published information available here is uneven: SOAX has specific mobile-product claims, while current comparable figures for the other three are not established. “Not stated” means the cited information does not provide a value; it does not mean a provider lacks the feature.
| Provider | What is established | Best reason to evaluate it | What to verify before buying |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOAX | SOAX’s official mobile page (2026) advertises more than 33 million mobile IPs in 195+ locations; 5G, 4G, 3G and LTE; country, region, city and ISP targeting; sticky sessions; Web Optimizer; and MaxIP controls. It lists public-web scraping and price monitoring as use cases. | Granular location and carrier/ISP targeting. | Availability and effective cost for your target locations, session needs, and actual observed success on your permitted target sites. |
| Oxylabs | Its 2025 enterprise selection guide describes its proxy solutions as designed for “enterprise scalability and reliability” and includes mobile proxies in a broader data-acquisition suite. A current official mobile price table is not stated in the cited information. | Enterprise-scale acquisition where support, integrations and procurement controls justify evaluating a premium option. | Current mobile availability, target coverage, pricing, minimum commitment and the specific support or integration terms you need. |
| Bright Data | Comparison sources identify it among major mobile-proxy providers. A 2026 TechRadar review says it appears to have phased out mobile proxies. | Consider only if Bright Data confirms the mobile product is currently available for your target country and use case. | Whether mobile access is currently offered in the country you need, and the applicable product, terms and price. |
| Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) | 2026 comparison material names Decodo/Smartproxy among leading alternatives, but an authoritative current mobile-product page is not established in the cited information. | A mid-market candidate to check directly rather than assume is available. | Current mobile product status, pool and targeting details, session behavior, support, commitment and price. |
Only SOAX’s mobile-page figures above are specific numeric mobile-product claims in this comparison. SOAX’s page also claims a 99.95% success rate (SOAX, 2026); treat that as a vendor claim, not an independent result or a guarantee for your sites, locations or workload. No independent apples-to-apples test covering all four providers establishes relative latency, uptime, block rate, success rate or cost per gigabyte. Do not infer that one provider wins those measures from the shortlist.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Which provider fits which scraping requirement?
Choose SOAX for location precision—subject to a real target test
SOAX is the strongest documented candidate here when a job depends on selecting a country, region, city or ISP. Its official 2026 page advertises those targeting controls and sticky sessions, as well as access across 5G, 4G, 3G and LTE. These are product claims, not proof that a particular carrier, city or target website will be reachable at the quality your project requires. Ask for confirmation of the exact location/carrier combinations that matter, then test them on a representative, permitted workload.
The same page names public-web scraping and price monitoring as use cases. That helps establish intended use, but does not settle whether a specific website allows automated collection, whether the result is complete, or whether your collection method complies with applicable rules.
#1 Best Overall
Evaluate Oxylabs when enterprise requirements drive the decision
Oxylabs’ 2025 enterprise selection guide positions its proxy suite around scalability and reliability and places mobile proxies alongside other data-acquisition tools. That is a reason to include it when a project has organizational requirements such as procurement review, support expectations or integration planning. It is not a quantified comparison of mobile performance, nor does the cited guide provide a current mobile price table. Get a current written quote and product specification for the exact mobile service and geography under consideration.
Keep Bright Data conditional and Decodo unverified until confirmed
For Bright Data, product availability is the first gate, not a detail to check after selecting a plan. A 2026 TechRadar review says the provider appears to have phased out mobile proxies, while comparison sources still list it among major mobile providers. Because that evidence is not consistent, ask Bright Data directly whether it sells mobile proxies for your target country and use case now. Do not treat a general proxy or scraping product as proof of current mobile-proxy availability.
For Decodo (formerly Smartproxy), comparison material identifies it as a leading alternative, but a current authoritative mobile-product page was not located in the cited information. Confirm that the product exists in the form you need before comparing its price or features. A brand’s inclusion in a comparison is not a substitute for a current plan description.
What to compare before signing a contract
Ask each provider the same questions, and record answers for the exact geography and workload you intend to run. A “large pool” or “global coverage” claim is less useful than knowing whether the required city, ISP and session behavior are available under the proposed plan.
- Pool and coverage: What does the provider count as an IP, how current is that count, and which countries, regions, cities and carriers can you target? For a location-sensitive task, ask for the specific target combinations rather than relying only on a global total.
- Session behavior: Can a session remain sticky for the duration your workflow requires, or does the product rotate addresses? Ask how session duration and rotation are controlled and what happens when a session drops. SOAX advertises sticky sessions; equivalent details for the other providers are not stated in the cited information.
- Access and integration: Confirm supported protocols, authentication methods, connection limits and any API, browser or scraping tooling your implementation depends on. Comparable details for these four are not established here, so get them in writing rather than assuming feature parity.
- Quality evidence: Ask how the provider defines a “success,” what period and locations a reported rate covers, and whether the figure is independently measured. SOAX’s 99.95% figure is a vendor claim from 2026; no common independent test supports ranking the four providers.
- Compliance and sourcing: Ask how access is sourced, what controls govern acceptable use, and what information the provider can supply for your compliance review. The cited material does not establish a comparative sourcing-transparency result for these providers.
- Support and commercial terms: Confirm support hours and escalation routes, trial or evaluation access, minimum spend, billing unit, expiration or rollover rules, concurrency limits and cancellation terms. Current comparable commitments and support terms are not stated in the cited information.
- Effective cost: Compare the total cost for the successful, usable work your project needs—not just a headline rate. Include unsuccessful requests, retries, required concurrency and any minimum commitment. No comparable current per-gigabyte prices are established here.
Keep the answers dated: product availability, pool figures and pricing can change. A quote or product page should identify the plan, target country and billing terms it actually covers.
A practical evaluation plan
- Define the job. Write down target countries and cities, whether ISP-level targeting is necessary, how long a session must persist, the expected crawl pattern, and what counts as a usable result. Separate essential requirements from preferences.
- Confirm eligibility and availability. Ask providers whether their current mobile product covers the exact geography and permitted use. For Bright Data and Decodo, establish current mobile-product status before proceeding; for SOAX and Oxylabs, confirm the requested plan and locations rather than relying on broad descriptions.
- Request comparable written terms. Ask for price, billing basis, minimum commitment, included limits, session controls, authentication/protocol support and support arrangements in the same format from each vendor. Mark unavailable or unstated answers rather than filling gaps by assumption.
- Run a controlled, authorized pilot. Use a small set of representative pages and locations you are allowed to access. Keep the target, request pattern, time window and success definition consistent across candidate providers. Avoid drawing conclusions from one endpoint, one city or one short run.
- Measure your outcome. Track completed useful records, failed or blocked attempts, latency distribution, retries, data transferred and total pilot spend. These measurements describe your own conditions; they should not be presented as universal provider benchmarks.
- Recheck before rollout. Verify current availability, price and terms immediately before committing. Set limits for spend and request volume, and retain a fallback plan if a location or product is unavailable.
This process is particularly important for geo-targeted scraping: a provider’s advertised footprint says where it claims coverage, not whether a site will show the desired localized result for every request. Validate the output itself, and use the smallest scope that answers the business question.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Performance, reliability and cost: what the available evidence can support
There is no defensible universal performance winner among these four from the evidence summarized here. The sources do not provide a common workload, region, date range, target set or definition of success for a cross-provider benchmark. SOAX’s 99.95% success-rate figure is explicitly a SOAX vendor claim from 2026; it should not be compared as though it were independently measured under the same conditions as another provider’s result.
Similarly, there is no established current price comparison or effective cost-per-gigabyte ranking. Oxylabs has no current official mobile price table in the cited information, and comparable current mobile prices for all four are not stated. Request a quote or pricing schedule with the same geography, expected usage and commitment assumptions. A lower quoted unit rate does not necessarily mean a lower cost for completed work if your own pilot shows more retries or unusable results; measure that rather than guessing.
For reliability, ask vendors to define any success or uptime figure and identify the time period, service, geography, exclusions and measurement method. Without those details, a percentage is not a like-for-like comparison. Use your pilot to understand performance for your own endpoints and retain monitoring after launch, since results can vary by target and location.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Screenshot capture is a different tool from a mobile proxy
If your actual need is a visual record of a rendered webpage—not collection of location-dependent data through mobile IPs—a screenshot service may be a simpler fit. ScreenshotNeo is a website screenshot API and MCP server, not a mobile proxy, and it does not replace proxy access for geo-targeted scraping. It is an alternative to try first when the desired output is a screenshot or PDF rather than scraped records.
For example, one GET request can save a screenshot as WebP (see the ScreenshotNeo API documentation):
curl -G "https://api.screenshotneo.com/v1/shot" -d access_key=YOUR_API_KEY --data-urlencode url=https://stripe.com -o shot.webpScreenshotNeo can accept cookie/consent banners and remove more than 60 known consent platforms, newsletter popups and chat widgets before capture; each step can be turned off. Bot checks/CAPTCHAs, blank pages, timeouts, failed loads and cache hits cost nothing, and responses report the page verdict and billed status in headers. Its MCP server offers take_screenshot, get_page_info and capture_pdf for Claude, Cursor and other MCP clients. The free plan includes 1,000 screenshots per month with no card; paid plans start at $5 for 3,000 shots. Sign up for ScreenshotNeo’s free plan to try screenshot capture without a card.
Common selection mistakes
- Treating an advertised pool as guaranteed access: A pool-size claim does not establish availability for a particular city, ISP or target. Confirm coverage and test the result you need.
- Comparing unlike success rates: A vendor percentage without a shared definition and test conditions is not a cross-provider benchmark. Label SOAX’s stated 99.95% as its 2026 vendor claim.
- Assuming a listed brand still sells mobile access: Bright Data’s status is specifically uncertain in the cited 2026 material; Decodo’s current mobile product is not established by an authoritative page in the cited material. Verify directly before evaluating plan economics.
- Choosing on headline price alone: Obtain the same billing and commitment details from each provider, then compare them against the usable output and actual retries in your pilot.
- Assuming a proxy solves every collection issue: Network location is only one input to a scraping workflow. Confirm that your target permits the activity and that the collected output meets your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a mobile proxy guarantee that a website will show the correct local version?
No such guarantee is established by the provider claims summarized here. Verify the page’s actual localized content under your target geography and test conditions.
Can I use a screenshot API instead of a mobile proxy for geo-targeted scraping?
No. A screenshot API returns a rendered visual capture; it is not a mobile IP service and does not provide the network-location function a geo-targeted proxy workflow requires.
Recommended Free Tools
Which provider has independently proven the highest success rate?
The cited material does not establish an independent cross-provider success-rate winner.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
