iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Union government and the Election Commission of India (ECI) on a petition alleging that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar acted unilaterally. The bench sought responses and said it would examine records, but declined interim requests to suspend the CEC or require unanimous decisions while the case is pending. It has not issued a final ruling or invalidated a Form 6 change.
What the Supreme Court has done so far
According to The Indian Express report published October 6, 2026, a three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana, issued notice to the Centre and the ECI. The petition was filed by Patna resident Rakesh Kumar Singh, who is seeking the CEC’s removal and challenging an ongoing exercise.
The Court sought responses and indicated that it would examine the relevant records. CJI Surya Kant was quoted as saying, “We can always annul any decision.” That is a statement about the Court’s ability to review decisions; it is not an order annulling any decision in this case.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →What the petition alleges—and what the Court has not found
The petition alleges unilateral conduct by the CEC and asks the Court to obtain original records. It reportedly relies on an Indian Express investigation published September 23, which said Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had objected 14 times in 10 months to steps taken by the Commission under the CEC. The reported examples included keeping commissioners uninformed and decisions involving additions to or deletions from voter rolls. This is an account attributed to the investigation, not a finding by the Court.
#1 Best Overall
The petitioner also sought a declaration against the ongoing exercise and asked for interim measures, including suspension of the CEC or a direction requiring unanimous decision-making until the next hearing. The bench declined those interim requests. The proceeding therefore remains at the notice-and-response stage in the reporting available here: the Court has not found the allegations proven, ordered the CEC’s removal, or conclusively annulled a Commission decision.
What is Form 6, and how does it relate to the case?
Form 6 is the form used to apply for enrolment as an elector under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. The separate Form 6 explainer published by The Indian Express says the online version had added a declaration asking whether an applicant, parent, or grandparent appeared on a previous Special Intensive Revision (SIR) roll. Applicants answering yes were asked for additional details about the roll’s location.
Rank #2
The reported controversy includes whether the form could be changed without amending the rules. The October 6 report says the ECI announced on September 26 that Form 6 would revert to the version prescribed by the 1960 Rules. The official ECI release and any Gazette amendment were not available in the cited reporting, so that report alone does not establish which version is currently operational. The Court’s notice in the petition should not be read as a ruling on the disputed form change.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What a separate Supreme Court SIR judgment establishes
A May 27, 2026 official Supreme Court summary in a separate Bihar SIR case, 2026 INSC 564, describes Form 6 as prescribed by the 1960 Rules. In that distinct case, the Court said the ECI had some authority to design a documentation framework for an SIR, but that its authority remained bounded by the statutory scheme and that departures needed a rational connection to the exercise’s objective.
That judgment provides legal context for why the prescribed form and the ECI’s authority to alter related procedures matter. It does not decide whether the Form 6 change in the new petition was lawful, and it is not an order in this case.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What remains unconfirmed
The reporting cited here does not establish a matching official docket entry, a written notice or order, or the petition’s next hearing date. Those details should be treated as unconfirmed unless an official case record or later reliable report confirms them. The case’s status and the live Form 6 version may change as the Court and ECI publish further information.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
