Recommended Free Tools
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
McAfee researchers said the March 20, 2013, data-wiping attacks in South Korea marked the destructive end of a covert espionage campaign that had been active for at least four years. The earlier malware searched for military-related information and sent collected material to an IRC channel; the later wiper erased hard drives and master boot records. SecurityWeek reported McAfee’s findings on July 9, 2013, but the account did not identify a responsible country or establish who ultimately received the collected data.
What happened in the Dark Seoul incident?
On March 20, 2013, destructive malware hit South Korean systems, including those at television networks and financial institutions. SecurityWeek reported McAfee’s estimate that about 30,000 machines had their hard drives and master boot records erased. The incident became known as the Dark Seoul attack.
McAfee’s report described the wiping attack as the conclusion of a longer operation: “The attacks on South Korean targets were actually the conclusion of a covert espionage campaign.” The distinction matters: the destructive payload and the earlier information-collecting malware served different functions. The reporting does not establish that the earlier collection malware was actively gathering information during the March 2013 wiping event.
How did the campaign develop?
| Period | What SecurityWeek reported about McAfee’s findings |
|---|---|
| 2007–2008, possible | Some malware versions may have existed as early as this period. This was a tentative estimate, not the firmer date for the related keyword-searching malware. |
| At least 2009 | Related keyword-searching malware dated back at least to this year. The report said it had been implanted in a social media site popular with South Korean military personnel. |
| March 20, 2013 | The Dark Seoul incident used destructive malware to wipe systems and master boot records. |
| July 9, 2013 | SecurityWeek published its account of McAfee’s findings. |
McAfee called the operation “Operation Troy,” a name based on references to the ancient city found in the code. The report described the campaign as spanning at least four years, while the 2007–2008 estimate remained a possibility rather than a confirmed starting date.
#1 Best Overall
What did the earlier espionage malware do?
The earlier malware reportedly searched for dozens of Korean-language terms related to military matters. Examples included “U.S. Army,” “secret,” “Joint Chiefs of Staff,” and “Operation Key Resolve.” It then sent collected material over encrypted channels to an IRC channel.
The destination of the data after that transfer was unknown. The available account also did not establish who could access it, whether the intended recipients successfully used it, or the full list of historical victims. McAfee warned of the potential risk in a scenario where intelligence gathering precedes destruction: “This capability could be devastating if military networks were to suddenly be wiped after an adversary had gathered intelligence.”
What connected the espionage malware to the wiper?
SecurityWeek reported that McAfee researchers compared the destructive malware with the earlier keyword-searching malware and found a shared compilation-directory structure, a cryptographic key, and a compiler. McAfee’s Brian Kenyon said these clues indicated a single group. The report also characterized the code as custom-built, without apparent components from other malware families or toolkits.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Those observations support a technical relationship as reported by McAfee; the conclusion that one group was responsible is an inference from those clues. SecurityWeek explicitly said McAfee did not identify a responsible country. South Korea had accused North Korea in earlier cases, but this campaign evidence does not prove North Korean responsibility.
Rank #3
How was the malware reportedly delivered?
McAfee’s findings, as summarized by SecurityWeek, described injection and phishing, including attacks involving compromised Korean-language religious, social, and shopping websites. Some code may have masqueraded as products from AhnLab, South Korea’s largest antivirus vendor, according to that account.
These are historical claims about the campaign reported in 2013. They are not current indicators of compromise and do not show that those websites or AhnLab products are compromised today.
Rank #4
What is established—and what remains unknown?
- Reported impact: McAfee’s estimate, as reported by SecurityWeek in 2013, was about 30,000 wiped machines, including systems at South Korean television networks and financial institutions.
- Reported connection: Shared development characteristics linked the wiper to earlier espionage malware in McAfee’s analysis, supporting its assessment of a multi-year campaign.
- Unidentified sponsor: The reporting did not name a country responsible for Operation Troy.
- Unclear intelligence outcome: The ultimate recipient of the data sent to the IRC channel, who could access it, and the complete historical victim list were not known.
The accessible account is Fahmida Y. Rashid’s July 9, 2013 SecurityWeek report on McAfee’s findings, which links to McAfee’s original Operation Troy white paper. The claims above are attributed to McAfee through SecurityWeek’s summary; they are not independent re-testing of the original report or malware samples.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

