Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

Pratyusha Banerjee’s mother, Soma Banerjee, objected after the Bombay High Court discharged actor-producer Rahul Raj Singh from the case connected to her daughter’s 2016 death. In an interview with Hindustan Times published October 1, 2026, she questioned how the High Court’s decision followed an earlier Sessions Court rejection of Singh’s discharge plea. She said she was discussing possible next steps with her husband and legal team; the interview did not confirm that the family had filed a challenge. Read the interview.

What Soma Banerjee said about the decision

Soma Banerjee questioned the discharge and asked how it could happen after the Sessions Court had already considered the case. Hindustan Times quoted her saying: “Usko chorrna hain nahin, yeh toh galat hain. Session court mein already hain case, how can this verdict happen. How can he be released by calling him innocent, this is the big question. Koi saboot nahin dekha, kuch nahin. Prima Facie mein session court bol chuka hain ya toh session court ko rakho ya high court, kuch toh karo aisa.”

She also said she continued to have faith in the judiciary, while asking, “Kya nyay?” She told the outlet: “I am discussing this with my husband and legal team on what should be the next step from our side.” The report says she attended the hearing and that her husband, Shankar Banerjee, left partway through because he felt the proceedings were not right. These are the family’s reported reactions, not findings about the court’s reasoning.

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

What the High Court did—and what “discharged” means here

Contemporaneous reports say the Bombay High Court discharged Singh from the case on September 30, 2026. The reports describe this as relief before trial. Although some headlines use “acquitted,” the reported outcome should not be described as an acquittal after a completed trial: the available coverage does not establish that a trial took place or provide the High Court’s order and full reasoning.

Hindustan Times’ report on the discharge and The Times of India’s report both describe the September 2026 outcome as a discharge. The exact operative language and legal rationale should be checked against the court order before drawing conclusions about what the decision establishes.

How the case reached the High Court

  1. 2016: The Times of India reported that the FIR followed a statement by Soma Banerjee to Bangur Nagar police and involved allegations under sections 306, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
  2. July 2016: Hindustan Times reported that the High Court granted Singh anticipatory bail. That earlier bail decision is separate from the later discharge; it should not be mistaken for the September 2026 disposition.
  3. August 2023: Hindustan Times reported that the Dindoshi Sessions Court rejected Singh’s discharge plea. Its account says the Sessions Court linked Banerjee’s apparent depression to alleged physical, emotional and financial harassment and exploitation. This is the outlet’s summary of the lower court’s observation, not an independently verified finding of fact.
  4. September 30, 2026: The Bombay High Court discharged Singh, according to contemporaneous reports. The precise reasoning is not established by the available coverage.

The sequence shows decisions at different stages; it does not by itself show that the High Court held a trial or reached a post-trial finding of innocence.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What is known about Soma’s next steps

Soma said she was consulting her husband and legal team about what to do next. The October 1 interview does not establish whether the family subsequently filed an appeal or any other challenge. It also does not supply the High Court order, a direct quotation from a judge, or the court’s complete explanation for discharging Singh.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.