iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Richard Dawkins’s line, “We are going to die, and that makes us the lucky ones,” is about the improbability of existing at all—not about death being pleasant or grief being misplaced. In the passage from Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder, mortality is part of the condition of having been born and experienced life.
What Dawkins means by “the lucky ones”
In ordinary language, Dawkins’s point is that a person could not have died without first having existed. Our lives are finite, but being here to experience anything is itself contingent. The word “lucky” names that chance of existence, not a benefit of dying.
Maria Popova’s July 25, 2021 essay develops this idea by considering how small changes in ancestry or history could have meant that a particular person was never born. Her framing invites readers to hold two thoughts together: life can be precious because it is temporary, and the end of a life can still bring grief.
Why the passage invokes the “sand grains of Arabia”
Dawkins’s passage compares the people who might have existed but did not with “the sand grains of Arabia.” It is a vivid way to evoke the scale of unrealized possibilities. It should be read as rhetorical imagery, not as a measured count or a statistically established probability.
#1 Best Overall
Does this make death a good thing?
No. The argument is not that dying is easy, desirable, or harmless to those left behind. It reframes mortality by pointing to the prior fact of being alive. That can offer perspective for some readers, but it does not erase pain, fear, illness, or the particular loss of an individual.
John Danaher’s 2016 discussion treats the passage as an attempted consolation for mortality and considers its limits. One useful question is whether existential contingency can console someone; another is whether a general reflection on existence can adequately account for a person’s grief or suffering. The passage offers a perspective, not a universal answer.
Rank #2
Where the quote comes from
Popova attributes Dawkins’s passage to Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder. Her essay supplies the reflective framing around it; the interpretation of contingency and gratitude should not be mistaken for a quantified scientific claim. Read Popova’s essay at The Marginalian, or Danaher’s critical discussion at Philosophical Disquisitions.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #3
- Oxford University Press, USA
- Great one for reading
- Comes with Proper Binding
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
