PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchiTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The published data does not show that people who build AI are less remote than people who use it. No survey covered here compares AI developers with AI users on their actual remote-work status, using the same workers, geography and time period. The closest evidence points the other way on a different measure: workplace AI use is more common in jobs that could be done remotely. That describes job design, not where people actually work, so it cannot settle the question about builders.
What “remote AI jobs” can mean
The phrase covers at least three groups, and the answer depends on which one you mean:
- Building AI: model research and development, or the infrastructure and product engineering that ships AI systems. These workers write and maintain the systems themselves.
- Requiring AI skills: job postings that ask for AI knowledge, whether or not the job involves building anything.
- Using AI at work: people in other occupations, such as accounting, writing or analysis, who use AI tools as part of their daily tasks.
Most surveys do not separate these groups cleanly. An “AI user” in a survey may be someone who drafts emails with a chatbot, or someone who fine-tunes models. A posting that asks for “AI skills” may describe an analyst role with one line about tooling. Any comparison has to define which group it is measuring before it can say anything about remote work.
How much workers use AI
The most direct U.S. measure of workplace AI use is a Pew Research Center survey fielded in October 2024 and published February 25, 2025. It found that 16% of workers said at least some of their work was done with AI, while 63% said they used AI little or not at all. The report, by Luona Lin and Kim Parker, states: “Overall, most American workers (63%) say they don’t use AI much or at all in their job.” That sentence reports what workers said about their own use. It is not an objective classification of AI use.
Pew also compared the occupations of AI users and non-users:
| Occupational measure (U.S. workers) | AI users | Non-users |
|---|---|---|
| Worked in jobs involving data processing | 63% | 42% |
| Worked in information and technology | 12% | 5% |
Source: Pew Research Center, 2025, survey fielded October 2024. These are broad categories. Information and technology work includes many roles that do not build AI systems, so Pew’s figures do not identify AI builders as a separate group.
AI use is higher in remote-capable roles
In its 2025 U.S. employee data, Gallup found that 66% of people in remote-capable roles used AI at work at least a few times a year, compared with 32% in roles not considered remote-capable. The Gallup report, “Frequent Use of AI in the Workplace Continued to Rise in Q4,” covers U.S. workplace data through Q4 2025.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →The key word is “capable.” Gallup classifies a role by whether its work could reasonably be done remotely. It does not count people who actually worked from home. A role that could be done from home but is performed in an office five days a week still falls in the remote-capable group.
This is the nearest thing to support for the title’s framing, but it cuts the other way. The roles where AI is most used are the ones that can be done remotely. Because the measure is role type rather than location, it cannot show whether AI users work remotely more often than AI builders.
Who actually works from home
The Federal Reserve Board’s report on the economic well-being of U.S. households in 2024, published May 2025, found that 41% of workers had worked from home at least some of the time in the prior week, and 18% were entirely at home. Location also varies by education:
| Education level | Worked entirely from home |
|---|---|
| Bachelor’s degree or higher | 26% |
| High school degree or less | 9% |
Source: Federal Reserve Board, 2025, report on 2024 data. Education and occupation both shape where people work. A comparison between AI builders and AI users therefore has to account for them, or a gap in remote work may reflect education levels rather than AI roles.
These figures come from reports published in 2025 that cover 2024 or late-2024 survey periods. Newer editions from each publisher may have been released since, so check the latest release before relying on a specific number.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What AI job postings can and cannot show
PwC’s 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer reports that job postings requiring AI skills rose 7.5% in 2024, while total postings fell 11.3%. That is a real shift in demand for AI skills. It is not a measure of remote availability. A posting asking for AI skills can be onsite, hybrid or remote, and the growth figure does not tell you which.
Why the builder-versus-user question is hard to test
A study that could answer the title’s question would need to:
- Define “building AI” (for example, model research and development versus infrastructure or product engineering) and “using AI” (AI tools embedded in another occupation).
- Separate fully remote, hybrid and remote-capable jobs, and measure actual work location rather than role type.
- Use the same geography and time period for both groups.
- Control for education, industry, seniority and self-employment.
None of the sources discussed here meets all four conditions. That is why the title’s specific claim remains unverified. It has not been shown to be false either.
How to check a specific AI role
Public statistics cannot tell you whether one particular job is remote. These checks can:
- Read the location line and the body of the posting for “fully remote,” “hybrid” or “onsite.” Treat “remote-friendly” or “remote-capable” wording carefully: it may mean the work could be done remotely, not that the employer hires remotely.
- Decide whether the job builds AI systems or uses AI tools. Titles such as “machine learning engineer” and “AI analyst” often describe different work, and a posting that lists “AI skills” can cover either.
- Ask the recruiter how much of the week is expected on-site and whether the employer hires outside your state or country.
- Confirm that the employer can legally employ you where you live. Remote roles can be restricted by country, state or tax jurisdiction even when the posting says “remote.”
The sources on this topic describe groups of workers and postings. They cannot tell you where a given engineer or user sits, so treat any single posting as its own data point.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
