Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

WebSharper review

Freemium#19 of 31 in Web Frameworks

A full-stack framework for .NET teams building browser and server features in C# or F#.

7.0/10Editor score
WebSharper7.0 Visit WebSharper

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

WebSharper is a full-stack framework and toolset for building web applications and services in C# or F#. It suits solo developers and small teams that want to build server and browser functionality around those languages. The framework compiles selected code to JavaScript and provides typed server-side endpoints, request routing, HTML generation, client-server remoting, forms with validation and client-side routing. Its reactive UI abstractions and support for both single-page interfaces and server-rendered pages give teams options for structuring the browser experience.

The framework’s breadth is its defining strength: WebSharper brings together server request handling and client-side features, with JSON serialization for remoting and shared types and code across server and browser. Developers can generate HTML from templates or code, and the framework can generate web workers from code. That scope is useful for teams seeking a connected C# or F# workflow rather than a framework focused only on routing or rendering. Deployment can be cloud or self-hosted, and the product is open source. An ORM is not included, so teams that need one should plan for that separately.

The Community plan is free forever and is described as ideal for solo developers; paid support plans are also available. Support channels include email, tickets, documentation and community resources. The language focus is also a real boundary: WebSharper is a fit for teams choosing C# or F#, not for teams looking for a framework centered on other languages. Small C# or F# teams that want typed server and browser development in one toolset should consider it. Teams requiring an included ORM, or preferring a different language ecosystem, should look elsewhere.

WebSharper pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Compiles C# and F# code to JavaScript for browser use
    • Combines typed endpoints, routing, remoting and HTML generation
    • Supports reactive UI, forms with validation and web workers
  • Where it doesn't
    • Requires working in C# or F#
    • Does not include an ORM
    • Paid support plans are separate from the free Community plan

WebSharper fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update