Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Utterances review

Free#18 of 18 in Commenting Systems

A free, open-source website comments widget for sites already centered on GitHub Issues.

7.0/10Editor score
Utterances7.0 Visit Utterances

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Utterances adds an embeddable comments widget to blogs, wikis, and other websites, with GitHub Issues serving as the discussion store. It suits personal sites and small projects whose owners already organize work in GitHub and want comments tied to page-specific issues. A page can map to an issue by URL, pathname, or title, and the bot can create a matching issue when the first comment arrives. Commenters authorize through GitHub OAuth, so the discussion flow is closely tied to GitHub rather than a standalone account system.

That GitHub connection is both the product’s defining strength and its main ecosystem constraint. Comments are GitHub issue comments, and page mapping can be configured along with issue labels; site owners can also choose a theme, including a dark theme. This structure can be a natural fit for a site whose owner already manages discussion in GitHub. It is less suitable for a publisher seeking a commenting service independent of GitHub, since the issues remain the underlying discussion space and commenter authorization depends on GitHub OAuth.

Utterances is free and open source, with the vendor describing the project as operating without ads or tracking. Moderation is handled through linked GitHub issues; dedicated moderation tools are not documented. The product’s focused model may work well when basic issue-based comment management is sufficient, but buyers looking for a broader commenting system should compare alternatives that offer dedicated moderation. Choose Utterances for a GitHub-centered personal site and configurable page-to-issue mapping; look elsewhere if GitHub should not be part of the commenting experience.

Utterances pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Maps pages to GitHub issues by URL, pathname, or title
    • Creates a matching issue when a comment is first posted
    • Offers GitHub OAuth, configurable labels, and theme selection
  • Where it doesn't
    • Stores discussion data in GitHub issues rather than a separate system
    • Requires commenters to authorize through GitHub OAuth
    • Moderation runs through linked GitHub issues, not dedicated tools

Utterances fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update