Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Specific review

#26 of 27 in Conversational AI Survey Platforms

Build chat-like surveys with AI follow-ups, in-product publishing and response analysis.

6.3/10Editor score
Specific6.3 Visit Specific

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Specific is a conversational survey platform for teams collecting customer, product, employee and other audience feedback. It replaces static forms with chat-like surveys that can ask AI-generated follow-up questions based on respondents’ answers. Teams can create surveys from natural-language prompts, publish them as pages or embed them in a product, and query responses in plain language. Its emphasis on simple, conversational feedback makes it a fit for small and mid-market teams, particularly those adding surveys to an existing product experience.

Survey creation and analysis are both built around AI interaction: users can generate questions from a prompt, revise questions and survey flow by chatting with AI, and analyze responses through natural-language queries. Surveys can include a maximum response count, and results can be exported to CSV. The platform lists adaptive follow-ups, AI question generation and multilingual surveys among its category capabilities. This combination suits teams that want more probing feedback than a fixed form can provide, while CSV export offers a straightforward way to take survey data elsewhere.

Pricing is usage-based rather than a conventional subscription: the published pricing details distinguish conversations, respondent replies, input and output tokens, and—when surveys are embedded—tracked users and events. A shown example applies to 100 conversations and includes 3 base questions and 4 AI-generated follow-up questions; each user reply is billed separately. That structure means costs depend on both responses and AI activity, with additional usage dimensions for embedded surveys. Specific is a sensible choice for teams that value conversational feedback and in-product publishing, but teams prioritizing broad integrations or more conventional, predictable subscription pricing should compare alternatives. It runs on web and API, offers email support, and lists GDPR compliance.

Specific pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Generates survey questions and answer-based follow-ups from prompts
    • Publishes surveys as pages or embeds them in products
    • Supports natural-language response analysis and CSV export
  • Where it doesn't
    • Usage-based charges include replies and AI input and output tokens
    • Embedded surveys may add tracked-user and event-trigger charges
    • Verified integrations and platform options are comparatively limited

Specific fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update