Sitewright

At a glance

• Editor score
  7.3 / 10
• Pricing
  Open source
• Best for
  Code-first agencies needing self-hosting
• Paid from
  None
• Client collaboration
  Yes
• Facts checked
  20 Sep 2026

• Where it wins

  • Code-first HTML, Tailwind, and DaisyUI authoring with reusable components
  • Client editing, typed CMS datasets, multilingual content, and white labeling
  • FTP, FTPS, SFTP, Git, static publishing, AI, and MCP support

• Where it doesn't

  • The code-first workflow is less approachable than visual-first builders
  • Self-hosting requires agencies to run the platform themselves
  • Commercial pricing and paid-tier differences are not presented

Our verdict on Sitewright

Sitewright is an open-source, self-hostable website platform for agencies managing multiple client projects. Its workflow centers on code-first HTML, Tailwind, and DaisyUI authoring, while clients can edit content in place through invite-based, project-scoped access. A built-in CMS supports typed datasets and detail pages, and agencies can organize work with reusable components, snippets, templates, and widgets. White-label administration, role permissions, and multilingual pages make it suited to agencies delivering branded sites across clients and locales.

Its strongest fit is for teams that want control over authoring, deployment, and the hosting environment. Sitewright supports static publishing with atomic output and incremental deployments, alongside FTP, FTPS, SFTP, and Git deployment options. The platform also connects with Anthropic, OpenAI-compatible endpoints, Claude Code, ChatGPT, and Cursor through its AI authoring assistant and MCP endpoint. Security-oriented controls include MFA/TOTP, passkeys, OIDC SSO, and project-scoped API keys. Together, these capabilities give technically oriented agencies several ways to connect client work with existing development and deployment practices.

The trade-off is approachability. Sitewright’s code-first model is less suited to agencies seeking a primarily visual editing experience or a low-setup website workflow. Running the platform as a container also places responsibility for self-hosting with the agency. Teams that value source-level control, client editing, reusable systems, and deployment flexibility should consider Sitewright; agencies prioritizing visual-first creation or avoiding self-hosted operations should choose a different type of builder.

Your product? Our editors can test Sitewright in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $99/mo →

Sitewright pricing

Sitewright fact sheet

Sitewright integrations

Sitewright lists 9 integrations on its own site.

• Anthropic
• OpenAI-compatible endpoints
• Claude Code
• ChatGPT
• Cursor
• FTP
• FTPS
• SFTP
• Git

Alternatives to Sitewright

• Wix StudioA broad agency workspace for building, collaborating on, and managing client sites.9.3
• DudaA paid agency builder with strong client workflows, reusable components, and API access.9.1
• Webflow AIA capable AI website builder for agencies that need Webflow workflows and code export.8.9

See all Sitewright alternatives →

Featured on iTechGuides

Sitewright is listed in our Agency Website Builders directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.

<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/sitewright/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/sitewright.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update