Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Best Papis Alternatives in 2026

Free#22 of 26 in Reference Management Software

The top Papis alternatives are Zotero, Paperpile and EndNote: 15 reference management software our editors would look at instead of Papis, in our ranking order.

6.6/10Editor score
Papis6.6 Visit Papis

Papis: A local, scriptable reference library for Linux researchers who value control. Where it falls short: the local web application is experimental..

Switching from Papis? For most reference management software buyers the best Papis alternative is Zotero, built for researchers wanting a complete free reference manager. On a budget, Paperpile starts at $4.15/user/mo.

Why People Look for a Papis Alternative

  • The local web application is experimental
  • Team collaboration is basic
  • PDF annotation and word-processor citation insertion are not provided

Quick Picks by What You Need

All 15 Papis Alternatives, Ranked

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

  1. Zotero

    Best forResearchers wanting a complete free reference manager

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 9.4 vs 6.6

    A broad, open-source reference manager with free core tools and optional paid storage.

    • PDF annotation
    9.4/10★★★★★
    Visit Zotero
  2. Paperpile

    Best forGoogle-centric academic teams

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 8.9 vs 6.6

    A capable, Google-centric reference manager for academic teams that need shared research libraries.

    • PDF annotation
    8.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Paperpile
  3. EndNote

    Best forResearchers needing deep citation-style coverage

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 8.8 vs 6.6

    A deep reference manager with broad citation support, PDF tools, and collaboration features.

    • PDF annotation
    Free plan · 30-day trial Our EndNote verdict → Visit EndNote
    8.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit EndNote
  4. Best forResearchers wanting discovery and AI PDF tools

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 8.7 vs 6.6

    A broad reference manager with strong PDF, discovery, collaboration, and AI tools.

    • PDF annotation
    8.7/10★★★★☆
    Try ReadCube Papers
  5. Citavi

    Best forResearch teams needing planning and collaboration

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 8.5 vs 6.6

    A collaborative reference workspace with strong PDF, citation, and research-planning tools.

    • Browser capture
    • Citation plugins
    • PDF annotation
    30-day trial Our Citavi verdict → Visit Citavi
    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Citavi
  6. Best forTeams wanting affordable PDF-focused collaboration

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 8.4 vs 6.6

    An affordable, PDF-focused reference manager with collaboration and Word integration.

    • PDF annotation
    8.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit Mendeley
  7. Best forCollaborative web and mobile research projects

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 8.3 vs 6.6

    A collaborative reference manager with annotation, AI recommendations, and broad citation support.

    • PDF annotation
    8.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit Lean Library
  8. JabRef

    Best forFree BibTeX and LaTeX users

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 8.2 vs 6.6

    A capable free desktop reference manager for BibTeX and BibLaTeX users.

    • PDF annotation
    8.2/10★★★★☆
    Visit JabRef
  9. Bookends

    Best forMac and iOS researchers wanting a one-time license

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 8.1 vs 6.6

    A feature-rich Mac and iOS reference manager with one-time Mac pricing.

    • PDF annotation
    8.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Bookends
  10. Petal

    Best forBudget-conscious teams wanting AI-assisted references

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 8.0 vs 6.6

    A budget-friendly reference manager with PDF workflows and AI-assisted research tools.

    • PDF annotation
    Free plan Our Petal verdict → Visit Petal
    8.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Petal
  11. Sciwand

    Best forAI-assisted literature screening across platforms

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 7.9 vs 6.6

    Sciwand brings academic search, AI screening, annotations and citation tools into one research workspace.

    • PDF annotation
    Free plan · 7-day trial Our Sciwand verdict → Visit Sciwand
    7.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Sciwand
  12. Logically

    Best forAI-first researchers working in a browser

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 7.8 vs 6.6

    An AI-focused web workspace combining reference management, annotation, research, and writing.

    • PDF annotation
    7.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Logically
  13. Paperite

    Best forWeb users wanting simple collaborative reference work

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 7.7 vs 6.6

    A capable collaborative reference workspace for web-based academic writing.

    • Citation plugins
    • PDF annotation
    7.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit Paperite
  14. RefWorks

    Best forInstitutions needing administration and APIs

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 7.6 vs 6.6

    A strong institutional reference manager with collaboration, integrations, and administrative controls.

    • PDF annotation
    Pricing on request Our RefWorks verdict → Visit RefWorks
    7.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit RefWorks
  15. Best forLaTeX and BibTeX collaboration

    • Better than Papis:
    • Editor score 7.4 vs 6.6

    A focused collaborative BibTeX workspace for LaTeX, Markdown, and connected research tools.

    7.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit CiteDrive

Papis Alternatives: Common Questions

What is the best alternative to Papis?

Zotero: #1 in our Reference Management Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.4 out of 10. A broad, open-source reference manager with free core tools and optional paid storage.

Is there a free alternative to Papis?

Yes. Zotero, EndNote, Mendeley Reference Manager, Lean Library Workspace and JabRef have a free plan or a free tier (10 of the 15 alternatives on this page).

What is the cheapest paid alternative to Papis?

Of the alternatives here that publish a price, Paperpile starts lowest, at $4.15/user/mo.

Why do people look for Papis alternatives?

The local web application is experimental; Team collaboration is basic; PDF annotation and word-processor citation insertion are not provided.

How do I switch from Papis?

Export your data from Papis (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Papis.

How to Switch from Papis

  1. Export your data from Papis (most tools have an export in their settings).
  2. Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
  3. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
  4. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Papis.

Papis vs Each Alternative

#ToolFree planPaid fromPDF annotationScore
22PapisFree6.6
1ZoteroYes$20/yrYes9.4
2PaperpileNo$4.15/user/moYes8.9
3EndNoteYesYes8.8
4ReadCube PapersNoYes8.7
5CitaviNoYes8.5
6Mendeley Reference ManagerYes$55/yrYes8.4
7Lean Library WorkspaceYesYes8.3
8JabRefYesFreeYes8.2
9BookendsYes$14.99/yrYes8.1
10PetalYes$4.99/user/moYes8.0
11SciwandYesYes7.9
12LogicallyYesYes7.8
13PaperiteYesYes7.7
14RefWorksYes7.6
15CiteDrive BibTeX Studio$50/yrNo7.4

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update