Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

MyParticipants review

#28 of 52 in Usability Testing SoftwareCard Sorting Software

A managed usability research workflow covering recruitment, sessions, and analysis.

6.7/10Editor score
MyParticipants6.7 Request a proposal

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

MyParticipants is a user research platform for product, design, and research teams that need participant recruitment alongside moderated and unmoderated usability studies. It supports interviews, usability sessions, prototype tests, card sorting, tree testing, surveys, and live website testing. The workflow also covers screening, consent management, scheduling, reminders, participant management, and backup participants, making it suited to teams that want recruitment and study operations in one web-based service. It can support research on web and mobile experiences, with integrations for Zoom, Google Meet, and Figma.

Pricing is quote-based. The vendor states that proposals depend on participant count, methodology, and turnaround time, with tailored proposals provided after a discovery call. This approach may fit teams whose projects vary in audience or research method, but it gives buyers less immediate visibility into plan boundaries and paid-tier differences. MyParticipants offers both self-service platform capabilities and managed research services, so the buying conversation can account for the level of support a team needs. Teams with recurring research programs should clarify the scope, turnaround expectations, and included services before selecting it.

Its strongest area is breadth within the usability research workflow. Teams can recruit from a verified panel, run moderated or unmoderated studies, test Figma prototypes or live websites, record screen, microphone, and camera sessions, and review AI transcription, session summaries, misclick tracking, success metrics, and per-task analytics. Scheduling and participant safeguards further support organized study delivery. MyParticipants is a good fit for teams prioritizing a managed, end-to-end research process. Teams that need transparent self-serve pricing or a narrower specialist tool may prefer an alternative with simpler purchasing.

MyParticipants pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Verified-panel recruitment with screening, consent, and backup participants
    • Supports moderated, unmoderated, Figma, and live website studies
    • Recording, AI transcription, summaries, and per-task analytics in one workflow
  • Where it doesn't
    • Quote-based pricing makes plan-to-plan value comparison difficult
    • Research teams must contact sales for a tailored proposal
    • Web platform may not suit teams seeking a dedicated native app

MyParticipants fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update