Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Miranda review

#5 of 25 in Legal Intake Software

A broad AI intake system for firms that need triage, routing, and follow-up automation.

8.9/10Editor score
Miranda8.9 Visit Miranda

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Miranda is a voice-AI intake platform for law firms handling inbound calls and prospective matters. It conducts conversational, adaptive intake; applies configurable qualification and legal-triage rules; checks statutes of limitations, conflicts, and jurisdiction; and routes inquiries to matters or attorneys. Its positioning fits plaintiff, litigation, immigration, family-law, and criminal-defense practices that need more than a basic contact form or appointment widget.

Pricing follows a contact-sales model. The commercial structure includes a monthly platform fee and a per-call usage charge, with the applicable terms set in an order form or pricing page. Miranda’s workflow extends from first conversation through consultation booking, warm transfers, SMS and email follow-up sequences, document drafting from firm templates, and a firm portal containing transcripts, triage signals, and next steps. That breadth makes it relevant when intake needs to connect qualification with operational follow-through rather than stop at lead capture.

The integration set covers legal case-management tools including Clio, Filevine, Litify, MyCase, CASEpeer, Smokeball, PracticePanther, and Lead Docket. It also connects with Calendly, Slack, Zapier, HubSpot, Salesforce, and DocuSign, supporting scheduling, communication, CRM, automation, and document-signing workflows. Miranda should appeal to firms prioritizing AI-led triage, routing, multilingual conversations, and coordinated follow-up. Firms seeking a narrowly focused intake form, transparent self-serve pricing, or a longer-established product may prefer an alternative.

Miranda pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Adaptive intake combines qualification, triage, and conflict checks
    • Routes matters and attorneys while booking or transferring consultations
    • Supports 40+ languages and connects with legal practice systems
  • Where it doesn't
    • Pricing uses a monthly fee plus per-call usage charge
    • Broad workflow coverage may exceed the needs of simple intake teams
    • Founded in 2026, giving it less operating history than older products

Miranda fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update