Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Marsh Blue[i] review

#3 of 5 in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) Tools

A consulting-led analytics offering for estimating cyber losses and informing insurance decisions.

7.8/10Editor score
Marsh Blue[i]7.8 Contact Marsh

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Marsh Blue[i] is a cyber-risk analytics offering for organizations that want a structured view of cyber exposure, particularly mid-market and enterprise teams weighing potential losses against insurance decisions. It supports quantitative cyber-risk assessment, loss estimation, customized scenario analysis, and reporting. Marsh positions it within its cyber-risk consulting and analytics services, rather than as a standalone security-monitoring product. That makes it relevant to decision-makers assessing financial exposure, not a replacement for operational security tools.

The central value is the link between scenarios, estimated losses, and insurance choices. Teams can use customized cyber-risk scenarios and analytics to inform how they evaluate exposure and discuss insurance decisions. Reporting adds a way to present those risk insights. This focus is useful when stakeholders need to reason about potential financial impact, but buyers should assess whether the analysis fits their own modeling requirements before selecting it; the offering’s defining emphasis is quantification and decision support, not monitoring.

Marsh handles the offering through its sales channel, so buyers should expect to contact the vendor rather than purchase through a self-serve plan. Blue[i] is best suited to organizations seeking consulting-led cyber-risk analytics and insurance-oriented insight. Teams looking primarily for a standalone security-monitoring product should consider a different type of tool. Buyers comparing CRQ options should also make sure the scenarios, loss estimates, and reporting meet their needs and that the sales-led engagement fits their procurement process. For organizations whose priority is connecting estimated cyber losses with insurance decisions, Blue[i] is aligned with that use case.

Marsh Blue[i] pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Quantifies potential cyber losses and analyzes risk scenarios.
    • Connects cyber-risk insights with insurance decisions.
    • Provides analytics-based cyber-risk reporting.
  • Where it doesn't
    • It is not positioned as a standalone security-monitoring product.
    • Pricing is handled through a sales contact.
    • The offering is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations.

Marsh Blue[i] fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update