Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Hedera review

Free#22 of 32 in Blockchain Platforms

Public token and smart-contract services, with a separate private EVM network option.

7.0/10Editor score
Hedera7.0 Visit Hedera

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Hedera is a public distributed ledger for developers building decentralized applications, including teams that need smart contracts, token services, or consensus messaging. Its services run on a network using hashgraph consensus and proof of stake. Solidity contracts execute on the Besu Ethereum Virtual Machine, while native services cover fungible and non-fungible token creation and management. The mix will suit teams choosing a public network for application activity, as well as regulated organizations considering a separate private EVM-compatible network option.

The service model is usage-based rather than a recurring software subscription: transactions and services incur network fees paid in HBAR, with a published fee schedule. That makes the relevant cost depend on the network activity being purchased, rather than on a named software tier. Teams evaluating deployment should account for those per-transaction or per-service charges. The public network is open source, and the deployment options include cloud and self-hosted; product details also specify a managed-service option. HashSphere is a separate private-network service, so it is distinct from using Hedera’s public network.

Hedera’s scope is focused on Solidity execution, consensus messaging, and token management, rather than a broad collection of listed features or integrations. That combination is a fit when those capabilities align with an application’s requirements, and the private network option matters to the organization’s deployment choices. One consideration is governance: Hedera network nodes are currently permissioned and operated by Hedera Council members. Teams that require permissionless node participation, or need a wider feature and integration set, should compare alternatives. Choose Hedera for its public token and consensus services or its separate private EVM option; look elsewhere if those specific capabilities do not outweigh its governance and breadth constraints.

Hedera pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Combines Solidity smart contracts with native fungible and NFT services
    • Consensus Service supports message timestamping and ordering
    • Offers a private EVM-compatible network option through HashSphere
  • Where it doesn't
    • Network fees are paid per transaction or service in HBAR
    • Hedera network nodes are permissioned and operated by Council members
    • HashSphere is a separate private-network service

Hedera fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update