Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

GitPLM review

Free#30 of 37 in Product Lifecycle Management Software

Focused PLM traceability for KiCad-oriented hardware teams working in Git.

7.0/10Editor score
GitPLM7.0 Visit GitPLM

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

GitPLM is an open-source product lifecycle management tool for small teams building hardware products. It keeps part numbers, bills of materials, manufacturing metadata, release information, and product designs in Git. Its terminal user interface supports Partmaster search and editing, while internal part number management and BOM generation cover core engineering records. Teams working with KiCad can also serve part data through the KiCad HTTP library API.

The product’s strongest fit is its focused engineering traceability. Git-based history applies to parts, BOMs, and revisions, giving teams a versioned record alongside their designs. GitPLM can combine source BOMs with Partmaster data, generate manufacturing information, process releases, and create combined BOMs across sub-assemblies. That makes it a practical match for electronics groups that want product records to follow a Git-centered workflow rather than sit in a broader, more general-purpose PLM environment.

Its ecosystem is deliberately narrow: KiCad is the listed integration, and the platform is centered on Windows, macOS, Linux, an API, and on-premise deployment. The published product scope does not extend to verified requirements or workflow automation, so teams seeking a wider lifecycle system may need another product or additional tools. Choose GitPLM when KiCad compatibility, open-source access, BOM management, and revision traceability are the priority. Look elsewhere if your process depends on a broad integration ecosystem, formal requirements coverage, or automated lifecycle workflows.

GitPLM pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Git-based history tracks parts, BOMs, and revisions
    • Generates manufacturing BOMs across sub-assemblies
    • KiCad HTTP library API connects part data to KiCad
  • Where it doesn't
    • Integration coverage is centered on KiCad
    • No verified requirements or workflow automation
    • Terminal-based workflows may not suit every team

GitPLM fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update