Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Galasa review

Free#5 of 7 in Mainframe Testing Tools

A flexible z/OS integration-testing framework for teams comfortable with Java and self-hosting.

7.8/10Editor score
Galasa7.8 Visit Galasa

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Galasa is an open-source framework for writing and running automated tests against mainframe and connected systems. It is aimed at teams that need z/OS integration coverage and can work with Java test projects. Developers use Managers to interact with services including z/OS files, batch jobs, commands, CICS Transaction Server and Db2. Gherkin-based tests and 3270 terminal interaction steps extend its reach beyond service-level checks, making it relevant for integration, regression and system verification work.

Execution can happen locally or in a shared Galasa Ecosystem. The ecosystem centralizes configuration, results, logs and test artifacts, and supports parallel test runs; its deployment is Kubernetes-based. That provides a route from individual development to shared team execution, while GitHub, JMeter and Selenium are among its listed integrations. Teams can also integrate test execution into DevOps pipelines. This makes Galasa a fit for organizations connecting mainframe testing with broader delivery workflows, though ecosystem operation adds infrastructure considerations compared with local runs.

Galasa is distributed as an open-source project rather than a priced hosted subscription, so teams should weigh adoption around engineering capacity and operating needs rather than subscription tiers. Documentation and community are its support channels. Choose it when open-source control, mainframe-specific managers and automated pipeline runs matter, and the team is prepared to own Java-based test development and deployment. A team looking for a managed service, a low-code authoring experience or vendor-led support should consider alternatives instead.

Galasa pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Automates z/OS file, batch, CICS and Db2 interactions
    • Runs locally or in a shared ecosystem with parallel execution
    • Supports Gherkin tests and DevOps pipeline integration
  • Where it doesn't
    • Java test projects require developer involvement
    • Shared ecosystem deployment depends on Kubernetes
    • Support is centered on documentation and community

Galasa fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update