Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Foswiki review

Free#35 of 38 in Knowledge Management SoftwareWiki SoftwareKnowledge Base Software

A self-hosted wiki for teams that want editable, permissioned, programmable knowledge.

6.4/10Editor score
Foswiki6.4 Visit Foswiki

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Foswiki is an open-source, self-hosted wiki and collaboration platform for teams, organizations, and project communities that want to shape their knowledge base themselves. People create browser-based topics, organize them into webs, attach files, and edit with WYSIWYG, markup, or HTML. The product is suited to groups that value control over wiki structure and behavior, especially where access rules and programmable pages matter. It is less suited to buyers seeking a hosted service or a broad, ready-made software ecosystem.

Foswiki’s standout strength is the combination of wiki authoring with structured data and programmable features. Forms and queryable metadata can organize information beyond free-form pages, while macros let teams create programmable pages and applications within the wiki. A plugin architecture provides an extension path, and web APIs are among its listed integration options. Together, these capabilities make it a fit for teams that need their knowledge base to reflect specific workflows or information models, rather than only storing documents. Browser editing, topic attachments, site-wide and advanced search, and revision restoration support the core knowledge-management work around that customization.

Access and deployment are the main trade-offs to weigh. Users and groups can have controlled access, and installations can integrate with corporate single sign-on systems; LDAP is also listed. The described distribution is self-hosted open-source software, so buyers should choose it when they can own the deployment approach rather than expecting a hosted plan. The listed ecosystem is focused on identity systems and APIs, not a long roster of integrations. Foswiki makes sense for technically capable organizations seeking a flexible, permission-aware wiki they can customize; teams prioritizing a hosted option or wider packaged integrations should look elsewhere.

Foswiki pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Browser-based editing supports WYSIWYG, markup, and HTML.
    • Revision history, restoration, and user- or group-based access controls.
    • Structured data, macros, plugins, and APIs support custom wiki applications.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Self-hosted deployment is the available model described.
    • Its listed integrations focus on SSO systems, LDAP, and web APIs.
    • The feature set centers on wiki pages rather than broader content types.

Foswiki fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update