Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

FeatQ review

#29 of 36 in Feature Request Software

A focused, email-first request board with APIs and MCP access on every plan.

6.1/10Editor score
FeatQ6.1 Visit FeatQ

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

FeatQ is a hosted feature-request and voting board for founders and product teams, with a particularly direct fit for solo builders and small teams. Customers can submit requests, search existing ideas, and vote with an email address instead of creating an account. Teams organize requests through New, Considering, Planned, In Progress, and Done statuses, then present progress through public roadmap and changelog views. An embeddable widget brings collection into an existing application.

The published plans show three purchase paths. Monthly costs $29 per month, while Yearly costs $19 per month when billed annually. Both include a hosted feedback board, per-board MCP server, agent-ready specification generation, embeddable widget, and public changelog. Lifetime costs $199 one time and provides lifetime access to one board with the same core capabilities. Every plan includes REST API and MCP access, allowing connected tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, ChatGPT, Gemini CLI, Grok, Lovable, Bolt, and v0 to work with request data. Email notifications can also alert voters when requests ship.

FeatQ’s narrow focus is its main advantage: it links public demand collection with an agent-oriented workflow rather than trying to cover broad product-management operations. The status model, upvotes, roadmap, changelog, and widget cover a straightforward feedback loop, while specification generation can help turn ranked requests into implementation-oriented output. Teams needing custom workflows, SSO, or a free entry tier should choose another product. For a solo builder who wants a public board, low-friction email voting, and API or MCP connectivity, FeatQ offers a compact cloud-based setup.

FeatQ pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Accountless email submission and voting lowers customer friction
    • REST API, MCP server, and agent-ready specification generation
    • Roadmap, changelog, widget, and status tracking in one board
  • Where it doesn't
    • No free plan; access requires a paid subscription or lifetime purchase
    • Custom workflows and SSO support are not included
    • Support is provided through email only

FeatQ fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update