Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Evidentum review

Free#15 of 38 in AI Literature Review Software

A free, open-source workbench for structured, database-spanning systematic reviews.

7.4/10Editor score
Evidentum7.4 Visit Evidentum

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Evidentum is a browser-based workbench for systematic literature reviews, designed for researchers who need a structured process from search through reporting. Its workflow covers PICO-based strategy building, retrieval across PubMed, Europe PMC, Cochrane, Scopus, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, Crossref, and ClinicalTrials.gov, followed by deduplication, screening, appraisal, extraction, and export. Free and open-source availability makes it a strong fit for individuals, research groups, and organizations seeking control over their review workflow.

The product’s breadth is its clearest strength. Screening supports inclusion, maybe, and exclusion decisions, while dual-reviewer workflows add conflict detection and agreement reporting. PDF and reference scanners support full-text handling, and AI-assisted critical appraisal can be paired with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, or xAI Grok through user-provided API keys. Risk-of-bias and reporting-quality checklists extend the workflow beyond citation management, while PRISMA flow, search-report, and data-extraction exports help turn review activity into structured deliverables.

Its operating model also shapes the buying decision. Evidentum runs on the web or through self-hosting, without a project-operated backend, and stores projects locally in the browser. That approach suits researchers who prioritize open-source access, local project storage, and flexible AI-provider choices. Teams that require a vendor-managed backend or a more centrally hosted collaboration model should choose an alternative instead. Evidentum is most compelling for systematic reviews that need broad database coverage and formal screening controls without a paid plan.

Evidentum pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Searches eight scholarly and clinical-trial databases
    • Supports dual screening with conflict detection and agreement reporting
    • Exports PRISMA, extraction, CSV, RIS, and BibTeX outputs
  • Where it doesn't
    • Projects are stored locally in the browser
    • AI analysis requires user-provided API keys
    • Vendor-managed backend hosting is not part of the workflow

Evidentum fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update