Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Eval review

#19 of 23 in Coding Assessment Platforms

A focused option for issue-based technical assessments with collaborative review and automated scoring.

7.5/10Editor score
Eval7.5 Visit Eval

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Eval is a web-based coding assessment platform for hiring teams that evaluate technical candidates through real-world open-source issues. Candidates work on authentic software problems rather than artificial tests, while reviewers can collaborate on submissions and use automated candidate scoring. Verified-candidate tracking and applicant-tracking-system integrations support hiring workflows, and assessments can draw from a catalog of open-source issues. It is suited to teams that want issue-based evaluation instead of conventional coding tests.

Pricing starts at $24 per month for the Basic plan, which includes unlimited seats, unlimited assessments, and basic support. The annual Basic option is $288 per year with the same listed features. Standard costs $120 per month or $1,440 per year, with unlimited seats, unlimited assessments, and basic support listed for both billing periods. Plus costs $360 per month or $4,320 per year and includes unlimited seats, unlimited assessments, and premium support. Eval also offers a 14-day free trial. The published plan details distinguish Plus through premium support; the listed Basic and Standard highlights are otherwise the same.

Eval’s defining choice is its focus on real-world open-source issue assessments, which can give hiring teams a more work-oriented challenge format. Collaborative candidate review, automated scoring, verified-candidate tracking, and ATS integrations add structure around that process. The trade-off is scope: the assessment type is challenges, and the product does not provide verified live coding or proctoring. Teams seeking open-source issue work samples and a focused review workflow should consider Eval. Teams that require live coding verification or proctored assessments should choose a platform built around those methods instead.

Eval pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Real-world open-source issue assessments
    • Unlimited seats and assessments on every plan
    • Collaborative review, automated scoring, and ATS integrations
  • Where it doesn't
    • Assessment scope centers on challenges
    • No verified live coding
    • No proctoring

Eval fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update