EditShare FLOW review
A media-focused DAM for ingest, editing workflows, approvals, and secure stakeholder sharing.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
EditShare FLOW is a media asset management and workflow platform for broadcasters, production companies, post-production teams, sports organizations, and other media operations. It handles video, audio, images, image sequences, PDFs, spreadsheets, and project files, with browser-based access, API support, and self-hosted deployment options. Its scope is centered on professional media production rather than broad, general-purpose document management. Teams that need to organize production assets, coordinate reviews, and connect media operations with editing systems are the clearest fit.
The published buying model is contact sales rather than a tiered public plan structure. That approach suits organizations that need a tailored deployment across on-premises or cloud-connected workflows, but it gives buyers less immediate pricing context during initial evaluation. FLOW’s feature set covers media ingest from live feeds and files, customizable metadata fields, tagging, logging, filtering, search, asset organization, transcoding, proxy generation, and media scanning. Review and approval workflows add comments and task assignment, while revision tracking links related asset versions for production control.
Integration breadth is a major reason to consider FLOW for media operations. It connects with Adobe Premiere Pro, Avid Media Composer, DaVinci Resolve, and Final Cut Pro, along with newsroom computer systems, playout vendors, QC providers, AWS S3, Wasabi, and Microsoft Azure. Open APIs and third-party workflow integrations support customization around existing production environments. Secure sharing and share links extend review beyond the core team, while guest sharing and approval workflows support external stakeholders. Choose FLOW when media ingest, editing-system connectivity, proxies, approvals, and workflow integration are central requirements. A general DAM buyer seeking a simpler, broadly oriented content library may prefer a narrower or more straightforward option.
EditShare FLOW pros and cons
- Where it wins
- Ingest, proxies, transcoding, metadata, search, and asset organization in one workflow
- Review, approvals, comments, task assignment, and linked revision tracking
- Integrates with Adobe Premiere Pro, Avid, DaVinci Resolve, and cloud storage
- Where it doesn't
- Sales-led pricing makes budget comparison less direct
- Media orientation may be narrower for general-purpose DAM requirements
- Advanced workflows may require API or third-party integration work
EditShare FLOW fact sheet, pricing and score →
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Last updated · How we research and update