Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Dicoogle review

Free#16 of 16 in PACS Software

A self-hosted DICOM archive with metadata search, DICOMweb, and an extensible plugin model.

7.2/10Editor score
Dicoogle7.2 Visit Dicoogle

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Dicoogle is an open-source PACS for archiving, indexing, searching, and retrieving medical images and their metadata. It is aimed at technical teams that need a self-hosted DICOM archive, particularly in research, teaching, or professional medical-imaging settings. The emphasis is on managing and finding imaging data rather than presenting a clearly documented end-to-end diagnostic reading workflow. It runs on Windows, Linux, or macOS and is distributed under GPL v3.

Search and extensibility are central to its fit. Dicoogle indexes DICOM metadata and supports pluggable query providers, with free-text, range-based, and query-by-example searches. Teams can also index directories and watch them for changes, then export search results to CSV. DICOM storage, query/retrieve, and DICOMweb services cover core archive access, while a browser-based interface and web services API provide user and programmatic access. The plugin architecture and SDK give technical teams a way to extend functionality; this is a stronger match for organizations able to work with a modular system than for buyers seeking a ready-made, narrowly defined viewer.

The main tradeoff is workflow scope. Although the product provides a web interface, diagnostic image viewing is not clearly documented, and there is no clearly documented supported-modality list. Those gaps matter for teams evaluating a complete PACS reading environment, so they should assess whether Dicoogle's archive, indexing, and search capabilities cover their needs before selecting it. It is a sensible fit for teams prioritizing free DICOM management and flexible retrieval; organizations that need an explicitly documented diagnostic viewer or modality coverage should consider alternatives that specify those capabilities.

Dicoogle pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Indexes DICOM metadata for free-text, range, and query-by-example searches
    • Includes DICOM storage, query/retrieve, and DICOMweb services
    • Plugin architecture, SDK, browser interface, and web services API
  • Where it doesn't
    • Diagnostic image viewing is not clearly documented
    • No supported-modality list is clearly documented
    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage their own environment

Dicoogle fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update