Confirm review
GIS-led asset management for public works, maintenance, and field coordination.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Confirm brings asset records, mapping, maintenance, and field work together for government infrastructure and public works teams. Siemens positions it for organizations managing networks such as city assets, roads, bridges, and parks. Its configurable asset register organizes records by category, class, and type, with customizable fields for local asset structures. Records can include condition, criticality, cost, and worth, giving teams a basis for maintenance and investment decisions. This is a fit for mid-market and enterprise organizations that want GIS-led field asset management rather than a general-purpose asset tool.
The product’s GIS capabilities are central to its workflow: native mapping connects with work scheduling and allocation, while teams can coordinate contractors and active work. Maintenance jobs and work orders support repair planning, and ConfirmConnect provides mobile field workflows. Residents can submit and track requests through a portal. Interactive reports, dashboards, KPIs, and GIS data visualization give managers ways to monitor assets and work. These capabilities suit public agencies coordinating field maintenance across geographically distributed infrastructure. Organizations looking for deeper predictive functionality or broader integration capabilities should compare alternatives.
Confirm is offered through contact sales rather than published self-service plans; Siemens directs prospective customers to request a demo. The product is available through web and mobile deployment, with iOS and Android listed as platforms. Its feature set includes work order management, preventive maintenance, and inventory management. Buyers should evaluate how its configurable register, GIS, scheduling, portals, and reporting map to their operational processes during a sales discussion. Confirm is most appropriate when public works workflows and spatial asset context are priorities; teams seeking a clearly priced subscription or more advanced predictive and integration depth may be better served elsewhere.
Confirm pros and cons
- Where it wins
- Native GIS connects asset mapping with work scheduling and allocation.
- Configurable records track condition, criticality, cost, and worth.
- Resident requests, contractor coordination, and mobile field workflows are supported.
- Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contacting Siemens rather than choosing a published plan.
- Its focus is government infrastructure and public works teams.
- Predictive and integration capabilities are less deep than higher-ranked suites.
Confirm fact sheet, pricing and score →
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Last updated · How we research and update