CodeIntegrity Agent Runtime Controls review
A self-hosted security layer that governs agent actions and traces data flows.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
CodeIntegrity Agent Runtime Controls is a security layer for coding agents, custom agents, and MCP clients. It is designed for security teams and developers who need to govern agent behavior while keeping operation within their organization’s security boundary. The product discovers agents and maps the tools and data they can access, then applies policies before potentially unsafe actions or tool calls execute. Its focus is runtime enforcement and oversight rather than a general-purpose AI agent development environment.
The central capability is control over what agents can do and where information can move. Teams can constrain agent capabilities, tools, actions, and scopes; block, modify, defer, or require approval for risky actions; and control sensitive data movement across prompts, tools, and agents. CodeIntegrity also traces data entering agent sessions across users, tools, memory, and connected systems. These controls are relevant where agents interact with sensitive data or tools and where actions need review before execution. Organizations seeking only basic agent discovery, or that do not need policy enforcement at runtime, may find this focus narrower than they need.
Deployment and ecosystem fit are key considerations. The product supports self-hosted operation, with activity and sensitive data kept within the organization’s security boundary. Listed integrations include Claude, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Google Gemini, OpenAI, and MCP clients and servers. It records prompts, decisions, tool calls, and outcomes for review, and the listed compliance specification is SOC 2. Prospective customers are directed to request a demo, and pricing is handled through contact with sales. This is a fit for enterprise organizations that prioritize self-hosted runtime controls; teams looking for public, self-serve pricing or a different deployment model should consider alternatives.
CodeIntegrity Agent Runtime Controls pros and cons
- Where it wins
- Enforces policies before risky actions or tool calls execute
- Constrains agent capabilities, tools, actions, and scopes
- Records prompts, decisions, tool calls, and outcomes for review
- Where it doesn't
- Requires self-hosted deployment within the organization’s security boundary
- Pricing is handled through contact with sales
- Support is offered through email
CodeIntegrity Agent Runtime Controls fact sheet, pricing and score →
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Last updated · How we research and update