Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Buffalo review

Free#13 of 31 in Web Frameworks

An open-source Go framework that brings application tooling and web features together.

7.6/10Editor score
Buffalo7.6 Visit Buffalo

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Buffalo is an open-source web development ecosystem for building web applications in Go. Its CLI helps create, build, run, and test applications, while the framework supports both server-rendered projects and API-only services. It is aimed at Go developers who want application structure and common web capabilities in one toolkit, from solo projects through larger teams. Buffalo runs across Linux, macOS, and Windows, and projects can be deployed to self-hosted or cloud environments.

The main draw is the breadth of the integrated workflow. Buffalo combines routing and request handling with middleware, sessions, cookies, and error handling. Plush supplies templates, layouts, partials, helpers, forms, and asset support; a Webpack-based pipeline handles frontend assets, and hot code reloading supports the development cycle. Pop ORM and Soda provide database tooling, while background workers and task execution cover asynchronous work. Generators create applications and models with test templates, and API-only generation gives teams a way to avoid server-rendered views when those are not needed. This scope makes Buffalo a fit for Go teams seeking an opinionated starting point rather than assembling each layer independently.

The tradeoff is that Buffalo centers on Go and its own included toolkit, so it is less suitable for teams committed to another primary language or an alternate frontend asset workflow. It is a framework, not a hosted SaaS product; teams looking for managed application hosting should consider a different kind of service. Support is listed through community resources and documentation. Choose Buffalo when a Go application can benefit from its built-in routing, templates, database tools, workers, and generators; look elsewhere if managed hosting or a non-Go stack is a requirement.

Buffalo pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Combines routing, middleware, sessions, cookies, and error handling
    • Includes Plush templates, Webpack asset handling, and hot code reloading
    • Provides Pop database tooling, background workers, and application generators
  • Where it doesn't
    • Focused on building applications in Go
    • Uses a Webpack-based frontend asset pipeline
    • Not a hosted SaaS product for teams seeking managed application hosting

Buffalo fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update